Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ARSVX vs WCMFX
ARSVX vs WCMFX Comparison
Open Charts ARSVX vs WCMFX
AMG River Road Small Cap Value N
Price$15.10
Change+$0.05 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.06B
WCM SMID Quality Val Fd Institutional
Price$3.37
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.92M
ARSVX vs WCMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ARSVX vs. WCMFX commentary
Nov 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ARSVX is a Hold and WCMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ARSVX has more cash in the bank: 1.06B vs. WCMFX (5.92M). ARSVX pays higher dividends than WCMFX: ARSVX (0.20) vs WCMFX (0.00). ARSVX was incepted earlier than WCMFX: ARSVX (20 years) vs WCMFX (6 years). WCMFX (1.45) is less costly to investors than ARSVX (1.37). ARSVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. WCMFX (15.00). ARSVX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMFX: ARSVX (2000) vs WCMFX (100000). ARSVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -11.30 vs. WCMFX (-76.30). ARSVX return over 5 years is better than : 21.21 vs. WCMFX (-65.40).
| ARSVX | WCMFX | ARSVX / WCMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 0.90 | 152% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 1.45 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.778 | -71.870 | 4% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.06B | 5.92M | 17,976% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.30 | -76.30 | 15% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.89 | -67.31 | -9% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.21 | -65.40 | -32% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.24 | N/A | - |