Ad is loading...
ARSZX vs SSGSX
ARSZX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts ARSZX vs SSGSX
AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value Z
Price$9.44
Change+$0.12 (+1.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets303.07M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$40.69
Change+$0.63 (+1.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.33B
ARSZX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ARSZX vs. SSGSX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ARSZX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.33B vs. ARSZX (303M). ARSZX (0.53) and SSGSX (0.52) have matching dividends . ARSZX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: ARSZX (8 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than ARSZX (0.98). ARSZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than ARSZX: SSGSX (2500) vs ARSZX (5000000). ARSZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.08 vs. SSGSX (-14.61). ARSZX return over 5 years is better than : 63.05 vs. SSGSX (23.96).
| ARSZX | SSGSX | ARSZX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 1.26 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 1.26 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.986 | -13.720 | 51% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 2500 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 303M | 5.33B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.52 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.08 | -14.61 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.36 | -16.35 | 14% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.05 | 23.96 | 263% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 2.97 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...