Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ARSZX vs WCMFX
ARSZX vs WCMFX Comparison
Open Charts ARSZX vs WCMFX
AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value Z
Price$9.99
Change-$0.01 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets343.84M
WCM SMID Quality Val Fd Institutional
Price$3.36
Change-$0.01 (-0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.92M
ARSZX vs WCMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ARSZX vs. WCMFX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ARSZX is a Hold and WCMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ARSZX has more cash in the bank: 344M vs. WCMFX (5.92M). ARSZX pays higher dividends than WCMFX: ARSZX (0.50) vs WCMFX (0.00). ARSZX was incepted earlier than WCMFX: ARSZX (8 years) vs WCMFX (6 years). WCMFX (1.45) is less costly to investors than ARSZX (0.98). ARSZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. WCMFX (15.00). WCMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ARSZX: WCMFX (100000) vs ARSZX (5000000). ARSZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -10.03 vs. WCMFX (-76.28). ARSZX return over 5 years is better than : 26.82 vs. WCMFX (-65.29).
| ARSZX | WCMFX | ARSZX / WCMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.90 | 109% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 1.45 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.200 | -71.870 | 0% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 100000 | 5,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 344M | 5.92M | 5,807% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.03 | -76.28 | 13% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.33 | -67.31 | -11% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.82 | -65.29 | -41% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement