Ad is loading...
ARWYF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.01 (-25.00%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
CVOSF
Price
$5.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
Ad is loading...

ARWYF vs CVOSF

Header iconARWYF vs CVOSF Comparison
Open Charts ARWYF vs CVOSFBanner chart's image
ARWAY
Price$0.03
Change-$0.01 (-25.00%)
Volume$18.91K
CapitalizationN/A
COVEO SOLUTIONS
Price$5.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$6.55K
CapitalizationN/A
ARWYF vs CVOSF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ARWYF vs. CVOSF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ARWYF is a Hold and CVOSF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (ARWYF: $0.03 vs. CVOSF: $5.05)
Brand notoriety: ARWYF and CVOSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ARWYF: 57% vs. CVOSF: 8%
Market capitalization -- ARWYF: $13.14M vs. CVOSF: $914.57M
ARWYF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $13.14M. CVOSF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $914.57M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ARWYF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCVOSF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ARWYF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CVOSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CVOSF is a better buy in the long-term than ARWYF.

Price Growth

ARWYF (@Packaged Software) experienced а -2.86% price change this week, while CVOSF (@Packaged Software) price change was +1.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.33%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-1.01% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CVOSF($915M) has a higher market cap than ARWYF($13.1M). CVOSF YTD gains are higher at: -32.756 vs. ARWYF (-83.643). CVOSF has more cash in the bank: 198M vs. ARWYF (957K).
ARWYFCVOSFARWYF / CVOSF
Capitalization13.1M915M1%
EBITDAN/A-30.32M-
Gain YTD-83.643-32.756255%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/A112M-
Total Cash957K198M0%
Total DebtN/A10.9M-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FIKVX13.66-0.04
-0.29%
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 20% Z
FSZZX8.86-0.03
-0.34%
Fidelity Advisor Sustainable EM Eq Z
CPODX44.35-0.17
-0.38%
Morgan Stanley Insight I
RTISX10.53-0.05
-0.47%
Russell Inv Multifactor Intl Eq S
NMIEX12.35-0.09
-0.72%
Northern Active M International Equity

ARWYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ARWYF and MLGO have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ARWYF and MLGO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ARWYF
1D Price
Change %
ARWYF100%
-2.86%
MLGO - ARWYF
12%
Poorly correlated
-0.37%
INSSF - ARWYF
9%
Poorly correlated
-1.76%
CVOSF - ARWYF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
XYLB - ARWYF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GRND - ARWYF
3%
Poorly correlated
-1.19%
More

CVOSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CVOSF has been loosely correlated with SPMYY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CVOSF jumps, then SPMYY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CVOSF
1D Price
Change %
CVOSF100%
N/A
SPMYY - CVOSF
56%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SPNUF - CVOSF
54%
Loosely correlated
N/A
AISP - CVOSF
43%
Loosely correlated
-22.87%
LIFX - CVOSF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
DAVE - CVOSF
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.13%
More