ARWYF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.01 (-25.00%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
1.21M
MLGO
Price
$9.23
Change
-$0.33 (-3.45%)
Updated
Aug 15, 01:44 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
104.55M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ARWYF vs MLGO

Header iconARWYF vs MLGO Comparison
Open Charts ARWYF vs MLGOBanner chart's image
ARWAY
Price$0.03
Change-$0.01 (-25.00%)
Volume$1.79K
Capitalization1.21M
MicroAlgo
Price$9.23
Change-$0.33 (-3.45%)
Volume$900
Capitalization104.55M
ARWYF vs MLGO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ARWYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MLGO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ARWYF vs. MLGO commentary
Aug 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ARWYF is a Hold and MLGO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 15, 2025
Stock price -- (ARWYF: $0.03 vs. MLGO: $9.56)
Brand notoriety: ARWYF and MLGO are both not notable
ARWYF represents the Packaged Software, while MLGO is part of the Computer Communications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ARWYF: 6% vs. MLGO: 47%
Market capitalization -- ARWYF: $1.21M vs. MLGO: $104.55M
ARWYF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $1.21M. MLGO’s [@Computer Communications] market capitalization is $104.55M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $325.02B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.88T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.88B. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $26.89B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ARWYF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMLGO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ARWYF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MLGO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MLGO is a better buy in the long-term than ARWYF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ARWYF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MLGO’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ARWYF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MLGO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MLGO is a better buy in the short-term than ARWYF.

Price Growth

ARWYF (@Packaged Software) experienced а -6.83% price change this week, while MLGO (@Computer Communications) price change was +6.28% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.19%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +2.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.23%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+0.18% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

@Computer Communications (+2.27% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MLGO($105M) has a higher market cap than ARWYF($1.21M). ARWYF YTD gains are higher at: 6.762 vs. MLGO (-91.529). MLGO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 8.44M vs. ARWYF (-1.58M). ARWYF has less debt than MLGO: ARWYF (567) vs MLGO (23M). MLGO has higher revenues than ARWYF: MLGO (75.3M) vs ARWYF (137K).
ARWYFMLGOARWYF / MLGO
Capitalization1.21M105M1%
EBITDA-1.58M8.44M-19%
Gain YTD6.762-91.529-7%
P/E RatioN/A0.57-
Revenue137K75.3M0%
Total Cash336N/A-
Total Debt56723M0%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ARWYFMLGO
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ARWYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MLGO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TANH1.880.06
+3.35%
Tantech Holdings Ltd.
FBIZ49.81-0.22
-0.44%
First Business Financial Services
COUR11.89-0.31
-2.54%
Coursera
OKLO73.66-3.76
-4.86%
Oklo Inc.
MFI41.87-5.93
-12.41%
mF International Limited

ARWYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ARWYF and MLGO have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ARWYF and MLGO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ARWYF
1D Price
Change %
ARWYF100%
-15.25%
MLGO - ARWYF
12%
Poorly correlated
-9.94%
INSSF - ARWYF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CVOSF - ARWYF
4%
Poorly correlated
+3.59%
XYLB - ARWYF
4%
Poorly correlated
-23.08%
GRND - ARWYF
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.37%
More

MLGO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MLGO has been loosely correlated with IDN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MLGO jumps, then IDN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MLGO
1D Price
Change %
MLGO100%
-9.94%
IDN - MLGO
47%
Loosely correlated
-2.22%
CXM - MLGO
37%
Loosely correlated
-2.66%
QXO - MLGO
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.19%
HKIT - MLGO
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.65%
BILI - MLGO
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.26%
More