ARWYF vs MLGO
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ARWYF is a Hold and MLGO is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ARWYF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMLGO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- ARWYF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- MLGO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MLGO’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- MLGO’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
ARWYF (@Packaged Software) experienced а -2.86% price change this week, while MLGO (@Packaged Software) price change was -9.81% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.33%.
Reported Earning Dates
MLGO is expected to report earnings on May 08, 2023.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-1.01% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| ARWYF | MLGO | ARWYF / MLGO | |
| Capitalization | 13.1M | 28.9M | 45% |
| EBITDA | N/A | -14.84M | - |
| Gain YTD | -83.643 | -97.913 | 85% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 96.15 | - |
| Revenue | N/A | 73.6M | - |
| Total Cash | 957K | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 1.25M | - |
| MLGO | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 52% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 53% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 58% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 47% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% |
ARWYF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that ARWYF and MLGO have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ARWYF and MLGO's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ARWYF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARWYF | 100% | -2.86% | ||
| MLGO - ARWYF | 12% Poorly correlated | -0.37% | ||
| INSSF - ARWYF | 9% Poorly correlated | -1.76% | ||
| CVOSF - ARWYF | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| XYLB - ARWYF | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GRND - ARWYF | 3% Poorly correlated | -1.19% | ||
More | ||||
MLGO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MLGO has been loosely correlated with IDN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MLGO jumps, then IDN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MLGO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MLGO | 100% | -0.37% | ||
| IDN - MLGO | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.42% | ||
| QXO - MLGO | 36% Loosely correlated | +1.12% | ||
| CXM - MLGO | 34% Loosely correlated | -0.90% | ||
| HKIT - MLGO | 27% Poorly correlated | -1.49% | ||
| RCM - MLGO | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||