Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ARZDX vs RMFCX
ARZDX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts ARZDX vs RMFCX
AMG River Road Dividend All Cap Value Z
Price$6.13
Change-$0.01 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69.33M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.07
Change-$0.15 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.9B
ARZDX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ARZDX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ARZDX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. ARZDX (69.3M). ARZDX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: ARZDX (3.68) vs RMFCX (1.26). ARZDX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: ARZDX (8 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than ARZDX (0.81). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. ARZDX (26.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ARZDX: RMFCX (250) vs ARZDX (5000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.77 vs. ARZDX (-37.18). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 54.95 vs. ARZDX (-33.39).
| ARZDX | RMFCX | ARZDX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.91 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.91 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.698 | 10.721 | 34% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 69.3M | 110B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.68 | 1.26 | 293% |
| Returns for 1 year | -37.18 | 7.77 | -479% |
| Returns for 3 years | -41.21 | 22.69 | -182% |
| Returns for 5 years | -33.39 | 54.95 | -61% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 79.02 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers