Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ARZDX vs RMFCX
ARZDX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts ARZDX vs RMFCX
AMG River Road Dividend All Cap Value Z
Price$6.17
Change-$0.03 (-0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.47M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$57.52
Change-$0.44 (-0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets106.6B
ARZDX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ARZDX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ARZDX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 107B vs. ARZDX (71.5M). ARZDX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: ARZDX (3.50) vs RMFCX (1.31). ARZDX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: ARZDX (8 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than ARZDX (0.81). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. ARZDX (26.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ARZDX: RMFCX (250) vs ARZDX (5000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.70 vs. ARZDX (-33.94). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 59.85 vs. ARZDX (-27.58).
| ARZDX | RMFCX | ARZDX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.91 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.91 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.980 | 6.021 | 49% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 71.5M | 107B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.50 | 1.31 | 267% |
| Returns for 1 year | -33.94 | 8.70 | -390% |
| Returns for 3 years | -35.76 | 28.43 | -126% |
| Returns for 5 years | -27.58 | 59.85 | -46% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 69.75 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement