Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ARZDX vs RMFCX
ARZDX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts ARZDX vs RMFCX
AMG River Road Dividend All Cap Value Z
Price$6.17
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69.32M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.45
Change+$0.07 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.46B
ARZDX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ARZDX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ARZDX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. ARZDX (69.3M). ARZDX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: ARZDX (3.64) vs RMFCX (1.24). ARZDX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: ARZDX (8 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than ARZDX (0.81). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. ARZDX (26.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ARZDX: RMFCX (250) vs ARZDX (5000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.71 vs. ARZDX (-37.90). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 56.41 vs. ARZDX (-32.42).
| ARZDX | RMFCX | ARZDX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.91 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.91 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.204 | 11.421 | 37% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 69.3M | 109B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.64 | 1.24 | 295% |
| Returns for 1 year | -37.90 | 7.71 | -492% |
| Returns for 3 years | -36.77 | 32.16 | -114% |
| Returns for 5 years | -32.42 | 56.41 | -57% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 91.12 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement