Advertisement
ASAPF vs NNCSF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASAPF is a Buy and NNCSF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ASAPF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNNCSF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- ASAPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- NNCSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ASAPF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NNCSF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ASAPF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- NNCSF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
ASAPF (@Medical Specialties) experienced а +4.44% price change this week, while NNCSF (@Medical Specialties) price change was +0.70% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Specialties industry was +3.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.20%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Medical Specialties (+3.05% weekly)Medical specialties are companies that make equipment used by the health care industry. Equipment manufactured and distributed by these companies include dialysis machines, blood analysis equipment, surgical equipment, dental instruments, and diagnostic tools, among other items. Large companies typically aim to produce and distribute high-quality products across a broad market spectrum. Smaller firms are more likely to specialize in a particular market segment. Due to the industry’s close association with medical treatments, they typically have low sensitivity to macroeconomic fluctuations. Within this industry, Abbott Laboratories, Medtronic Plc and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. are some of the companies with multi-billion market capitalizations in the U.S. stock markets.
| ASAPF | NNCSF | ASAPF / NNCSF | |
| Capitalization | 13.6M | 962M | 1% |
| EBITDA | -675.79K | 17.1M | -4% |
| Gain YTD | -8.961 | 21.324 | -42% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 138.89 | - |
| Revenue | 14.3M | 142M | 10% |
| Total Cash | 362K | 94.5M | 0% |
| Total Debt | 2.93M | 11.7M | 25% |
ASAPF | NNCSF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 36 | 29 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 43 Fair valued | 94 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 87 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 94 | 69 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 51 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 25 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ASAPF's Valuation (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NNCSF (94). This means that ASAPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NNCSF’s over the last 12 months.
ASAPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (87) in the null industry is in the same range as NNCSF (100). This means that ASAPF’s stock grew similarly to NNCSF’s over the last 12 months.
NNCSF's SMR Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as ASAPF (94). This means that NNCSF’s stock grew similarly to ASAPF’s over the last 12 months.
NNCSF's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as ASAPF (51). This means that NNCSF’s stock grew similarly to ASAPF’s over the last 12 months.
NNCSF's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ASAPF (100). This means that NNCSF’s stock grew significantly faster than ASAPF’s over the last 12 months.
| ASAPF | NNCSF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 42% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 45% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 57% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 44% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 44% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 41% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 78% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 86% | 17 days ago 60% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 46% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 42% |
Advertisement
ASAPF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that ASAPF and EMITF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ASAPF and EMITF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ASAPF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASAPF | 100% | N/A | ||
| EMITF - ASAPF | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PHG - ASAPF | 23% Poorly correlated | +1.24% | ||
| EDTXF - ASAPF | 22% Poorly correlated | +3.32% | ||
| NNCSF - ASAPF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| MASS - ASAPF | 10% Poorly correlated | +0.54% | ||
More | ||||