ASBFY
Price
$28.60
Change
+$0.16 (+0.56%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
20.33B
59 days until earnings call
BYCBF
Price
$1072.35
Change
+$8.10 (+0.76%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
10.29B
Interact to see
Advertisement

ASBFY vs BYCBF

Header iconASBFY vs BYCBF Comparison
Open Charts ASBFY vs BYCBFBanner chart's image
Associated British Foods
Price$28.60
Change+$0.16 (+0.56%)
Volume$7.93K
Capitalization20.33B
Barry Callebaut AG
Price$1072.35
Change+$8.10 (+0.76%)
Volume$42
Capitalization10.29B
ASBFY vs BYCBF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ASBFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BYCBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ASBFY vs. BYCBF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASBFY is a Hold and BYCBF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (ASBFY: $28.60 vs. BYCBF: $1072.35)
Brand notoriety: ASBFY and BYCBF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ASBFY: 8% vs. BYCBF: 6%
Market capitalization -- ASBFY: $20.33B vs. BYCBF: $10.29B
ASBFY [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $20.33B. BYCBF’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $10.29B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.47B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ASBFY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBYCBF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ASBFY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • BYCBF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both ASBFY and BYCBF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ASBFY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BYCBF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ASBFY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • BYCBF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ASBFY is a better buy in the short-term than BYCBF.

Price Growth

ASBFY (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -1.41% price change this week, while BYCBF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was +3.68% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +1.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.36%.

Reported Earning Dates

ASBFY is expected to report earnings on Sep 03, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (+1.77% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ASBFY($20.3B) has a higher market cap than BYCBF($10.3B). BYCBF has higher P/E ratio than ASBFY: BYCBF (23.42) vs ASBFY (21.05). ASBFY YTD gains are higher at: 13.178 vs. BYCBF (-20.015). ASBFY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.17B vs. BYCBF (793M). ASBFY has higher revenues than BYCBF: ASBFY (18.7B) vs BYCBF (8.24B).
ASBFYBYCBFASBFY / BYCBF
Capitalization20.3B10.3B197%
EBITDA2.17B793M273%
Gain YTD13.178-20.015-66%
P/E Ratio21.0523.4290%
Revenue18.7B8.24B227%
Total CashN/A629M-
Total DebtN/A2.21B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ASBFY vs BYCBF: Fundamental Ratings
ASBFY
BYCBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
22
Undervalued
30
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
75100
SMR RATING
1..100
4997
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5263
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8434
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ASBFY's Valuation (22) in the null industry is in the same range as BYCBF (30). This means that ASBFY’s stock grew similarly to BYCBF’s over the last 12 months.

ASBFY's Profit vs Risk Rating (75) in the null industry is in the same range as BYCBF (100). This means that ASBFY’s stock grew similarly to BYCBF’s over the last 12 months.

ASBFY's SMR Rating (49) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BYCBF (97). This means that ASBFY’s stock grew somewhat faster than BYCBF’s over the last 12 months.

ASBFY's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as BYCBF (63). This means that ASBFY’s stock grew similarly to BYCBF’s over the last 12 months.

BYCBF's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ASBFY (84). This means that BYCBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ASBFY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ASBFYBYCBF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
40%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
43%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
38%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
58%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
58%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
33%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ASBFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BYCBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
INRO29.330.30
+1.04%
iShares U.S. Industry Rotation Act ETF
EUFN31.770.21
+0.67%
iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF
PFLD19.560.06
+0.31%
AAM Low Duration Pref & Inc Secs ETF
PGJ28.600.07
+0.25%
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF
ROBN52.40-4.63
-8.12%
T-Rex 2X Long HOOD Daily Target ETF

ASBFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ASBFY and HNFSA have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ASBFY and HNFSA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ASBFY
1D Price
Change %
ASBFY100%
+0.56%
HNFSA - ASBFY
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SAPIF - ASBFY
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.35%
USNA - ASBFY
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.99%
DAR - ASBFY
22%
Poorly correlated
+3.52%
MDLZ - ASBFY
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.82%
More

BYCBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BYCBF and CELV have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BYCBF and CELV's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BYCBF
1D Price
Change %
BYCBF100%
N/A
CELV - BYCBF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ASBFY - BYCBF
12%
Poorly correlated
+0.56%
BABB - BYCBF
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.72%
BRRLY - BYCBF
6%
Poorly correlated
-2.75%
CFEIY - BYCBF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More