It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ASCBF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while.
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ASCBF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
ASCBF (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.53%.
Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.
ASCBF | FLAG | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago35% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 5 days ago38% | 1 day ago14% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago20% |
MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago40% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago22% | 1 day ago25% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago26% | 1 day ago58% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 16 days ago55% |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago32% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago33% | 1 day ago56% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that ASCBF and PLMIU have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ASCBF and PLMIU's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ASCBF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ASCBF | 100% | N/A | ||
PLMIU - ASCBF | 30% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
PEGR - ASCBF | 30% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
ASUUF - ASCBF | 29% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
MNTN - ASCBF | 27% Poorly correlated | -3.38% | ||
VMCUF - ASCBF | 26% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLAG has been loosely correlated with CSLUF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLAG jumps, then CSLUF could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLAG | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FLAG | 100% | -2.16% | ||
CSLUF - FLAG | 35% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
ASCBF - FLAG | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
FGMCU - FLAG | 23% Poorly correlated | +0.68% | ||
FGMC - FLAG | 20% Poorly correlated | +0.01% | ||
LION - FLAG | 1% Poorly correlated | +2.05% | ||
More |