ASCBF
Price
$11.40
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
May 30 closing price
Capitalization
26.7M
SZZL
Price
$9.97
Change
+$0.01 (+0.10%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
189.72M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ASCBF vs SZZL

Header iconASCBF vs SZZL Comparison
Open Charts ASCBF vs SZZLBanner chart's image
A SPAC II Acquisition
Price$11.40
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$13.96K
Capitalization26.7M
Sizzle Acquisition Corp II
Price$9.97
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
Volume$44.76K
Capitalization189.72M
ASCBF vs SZZL Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ASCBF vs. SZZL commentary
Jun 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASCBF is a StrongBuy and SZZL is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 07, 2025
Stock price -- (ASCBF: $11.40 vs. SZZL: $9.97)
Brand notoriety: ASCBF and SZZL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ASCBF: 515% vs. SZZL: 15%
Market capitalization -- ASCBF: $26.7M vs. SZZL: $189.72M
ASCBF [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $26.7M. SZZL’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $189.72M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $4.57B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ASCBF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSZZL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ASCBF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SZZL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ASCBF is a better buy in the long-term than SZZL.

Price Growth

ASCBF (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SZZL (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was +0.45% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +2.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.56%.

Reported Earning Dates

SZZL is expected to report earnings on May 15, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+2.77% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SZZL($190M) has a higher market cap than ASCBF($26.7M). SZZL has higher P/E ratio than ASCBF: SZZL (1111.11) vs ASCBF (24.76). ASCBF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -842.03K vs. SZZL (-2.75M). ASCBF has more cash in the bank: 442K vs. SZZL (1.08K). ASCBF has less debt than SZZL: ASCBF (225K) vs SZZL (964K). ASCBF (0) and SZZL (0) have equivalent revenues.
ASCBFSZZLASCBF / SZZL
Capitalization26.7M190M14%
EBITDA-842.03K-2.75M31%
Gain YTD3.920N/A-
P/E Ratio24.761111.112%
Revenue00-
Total Cash442K1.08K41,116%
Total Debt225K964K23%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JFAIX36.58N/A
N/A
JHancock Fundamental All Cap Core R6
JMIEX34.44N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Emerging Markets Equity L
BEQAX33.40N/A
N/A
American Century Equity Growth A
TVRAX16.64N/A
N/A
NAA Allocation Fund A
RYDHX100.24N/A
N/A
Rydex Dow Jones Industrial Average® H

ASCBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ASCBF and PLMIU have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ASCBF and PLMIU's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ASCBF
1D Price
Change %
ASCBF100%
N/A
PLMIU - ASCBF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PEGR - ASCBF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ASUUF - ASCBF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MNTN - ASCBF
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.84%
VMCUF - ASCBF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SZZL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SZZL has been closely correlated with SZZLU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SZZL jumps, then SZZLU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SZZL
1D Price
Change %
SZZL100%
+0.10%
SZZLU - SZZL
81%
Closely correlated
+0.20%
ASUUF - SZZL
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PLMIU - SZZL
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CSLMF - SZZL
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.34%
ASCBF - SZZL
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More