Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ASCLX vs NLSCX
ASCLX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts ASCLX vs NLSCX
AB Select US Long/Short C
Price$13.37
Change+$0.07 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.54B
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.34
Change+$0.07 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.45B
ASCLX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ASCLX vs. NLSCX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASCLX is a Buy and NLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.45B vs. ASCLX (1.54B). ASCLX (0.00) and NLSCX (0.00) have matching dividends . ASCLX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: ASCLX (13 years) vs NLSCX (14 years). ASCLX (2.76) is less costly to investors than NLSCX (2.43). ASCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 242.00 vs. NLSCX (48.00). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ASCLX: NLSCX (1000) vs ASCLX (2500). NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.31 vs. ASCLX (1.67). NLSCX return over 5 years is better than : 22.50 vs. ASCLX (13.80).
| ASCLX | NLSCX | ASCLX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.71 | 2.43 | 112% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.76 | 2.43 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.128 | 3.674 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.54B | 7.45B | 21% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.67 | 7.31 | 23% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.37 | 15.20 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.80 | 22.50 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.47 | 35.95 | 43% |