ASCN
Price
$86.00
Change
+$5.00 (+6.17%)
Updated
Dec 13 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
FMFP
Price
$11.00
Change
-$1.04 (-8.64%)
Updated
Jan 14 closing price
Capitalization
51.67M
Ad is loading...

ASCN vs FMFP

Header iconASCN vs FMFP Comparison
Open Charts ASCN vs FMFPBanner chart's image
Absecon Ban
Price$86.00
Change+$5.00 (+6.17%)
Volume$815
CapitalizationN/A
First Community Financial
Price$11.00
Change-$1.04 (-8.64%)
Volume$400
Capitalization51.67M
ASCN vs FMFP Comparison Chart
Loading...
ASCN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FMFP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ASCN vs. FMFP commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASCN is a Hold and FMFP is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (ASCN: $85.10 vs. FMFP: $11.00)
Brand notoriety: ASCN and FMFP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ASCN: 146% vs. FMFP: 89%
Market capitalization -- ASCN: $0 vs. FMFP: $51.67M
ASCN [@Regional Banks] is valued at $0. FMFP’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $51.67M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ASCN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFMFP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ASCN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FMFP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ASCN is a better buy in the long-term than FMFP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ASCN’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FMFP’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ASCN’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • FMFP’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FMFP is a better buy in the short-term than ASCN.

Price Growth

ASCN (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FMFP (@Regional Banks) price change was -8.64% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.25%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.11% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ASCN YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. FMFP (-8.638).
ASCNFMFPASCN / FMFP
CapitalizationN/A51.7M-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.000-8.638-
P/E RatioN/A12.34-
RevenueN/A15.9M-
Total CashN/A13.4M-
Total DebtN/A15.2M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ASCN vs FMFP: Fundamental Ratings
ASCN
FMFP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
10
Undervalued
26
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
38100
SMR RATING
1..100
6080
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4684
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8981
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ASCN's Valuation (10) in the null industry is in the same range as FMFP (26). This means that ASCN’s stock grew similarly to FMFP’s over the last 12 months.

ASCN's Profit vs Risk Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FMFP (100). This means that ASCN’s stock grew somewhat faster than FMFP’s over the last 12 months.

ASCN's SMR Rating (60) in the null industry is in the same range as FMFP (80). This means that ASCN’s stock grew similarly to FMFP’s over the last 12 months.

ASCN's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FMFP (84). This means that ASCN’s stock grew somewhat faster than FMFP’s over the last 12 months.

FMFP's P/E Growth Rating (81) in the null industry is in the same range as ASCN (89). This means that FMFP’s stock grew similarly to ASCN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ASCNFMFP
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
22%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
24%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
21%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
6%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ASCN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FMFP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ACFDX68.940.88
+1.29%
American Century Focused Dynamic Gr A
IEMJX9.500.08
+0.85%
Voya Multi-Manager Emerging Markets Eq C
SCVIX37.840.14
+0.37%
Allspring Small Company Value Admin
TRZZX57.560.21
+0.37%
T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Stock Z
INVNX21.510.05
+0.23%
Evolutionary Tree Innovators I

ASCN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ASCN and CNBN have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ASCN and CNBN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ASCN
1D Price
Change %
ASCN100%
N/A
CNBN - ASCN
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.27%
CMTDF - ASCN
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UNTY - ASCN
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.95%
OVLY - ASCN
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.49%
BPRN - ASCN
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.94%
More

FMFP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FMFP and SPXXF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FMFP and SPXXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FMFP
1D Price
Change %
FMFP100%
N/A
SPXXF - FMFP
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PNBI - FMFP
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.63%
CBTN - FMFP
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ASCN - FMFP
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ERKH - FMFP
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A