ASCN
Price
$97.50
Change
+$2.34 (+2.46%)
Updated
Aug 6 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
FMFP
Price
$10.32
Change
+$0.03 (+0.29%)
Updated
Aug 5 closing price
Capitalization
51.67M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ASCN vs FMFP

Header iconASCN vs FMFP Comparison
Open Charts ASCN vs FMFPBanner chart's image
Absecon Ban
Price$97.50
Change+$2.34 (+2.46%)
Volume$10
CapitalizationN/A
First Community Financial
Price$10.32
Change+$0.03 (+0.29%)
Volume$1.17K
Capitalization51.67M
ASCN vs FMFP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ASCN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FMFP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ASCN vs. FMFP commentary
Aug 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASCN is a StrongBuy and FMFP is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 07, 2025
Stock price -- (ASCN: $97.50 vs. FMFP: $10.32)
Brand notoriety: ASCN and FMFP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ASCN: 4% vs. FMFP: 596%
Market capitalization -- ASCN: $0 vs. FMFP: $51.67M
ASCN [@Regional Banks] is valued at $0. FMFP’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $51.67M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ASCN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFMFP’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ASCN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FMFP’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ASCN is a better buy in the long-term than FMFP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ASCN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FMFP’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ASCN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FMFP’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ASCN is a better buy in the short-term than FMFP.

Price Growth

ASCN (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.46% price change this week, while FMFP (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.29% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.90%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.21% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ASCN YTD gains are higher at: 15.341 vs. FMFP (-13.930).
ASCNFMFPASCN / FMFP
CapitalizationN/A51.7M-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD15.341-13.930-110%
P/E RatioN/A12.34-
RevenueN/A15.9M-
Total CashN/A13.4M-
Total DebtN/A15.2M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ASCN vs FMFP: Fundamental Ratings
ASCN
FMFP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3742
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
15
Undervalued
45
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
27100
SMR RATING
1..100
7685
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5958
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4183
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ASCN's Valuation (15) in the null industry is in the same range as FMFP (45). This means that ASCN’s stock grew similarly to FMFP’s over the last 12 months.

ASCN's Profit vs Risk Rating (27) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FMFP (100). This means that ASCN’s stock grew significantly faster than FMFP’s over the last 12 months.

ASCN's SMR Rating (76) in the null industry is in the same range as FMFP (85). This means that ASCN’s stock grew similarly to FMFP’s over the last 12 months.

FMFP's Price Growth Rating (58) in the null industry is in the same range as ASCN (59). This means that FMFP’s stock grew similarly to ASCN’s over the last 12 months.

ASCN's P/E Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FMFP (83). This means that ASCN’s stock grew somewhat faster than FMFP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ASCNFMFP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
26%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
36%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
34%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
28%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
32%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
24%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
21%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
24%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
9%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ASCN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FMFP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PYTH.X0.1151970.002836
+2.52%
Pyth Network cryptocurrency
AEUR.X1.1124290.016976
+1.55%
Anchored Coins AEUR cryptocurrency
WAVES.X1.0542350.011373
+1.09%
Waves cryptocurrency
EASG33.040.16
+0.50%
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Selection Eq ETF
DZZ1.75-0.05
-2.51%
DB Gold Double Short ETN

ASCN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ASCN and CNBN have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ASCN and CNBN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ASCN
1D Price
Change %
ASCN100%
+2.46%
CNBN - ASCN
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CMTDF - ASCN
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UNTY - ASCN
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.04%
OVLY - ASCN
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.65%
BPRN - ASCN
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.95%
More

FMFP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FMFP and SPXXF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FMFP and SPXXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FMFP
1D Price
Change %
FMFP100%
N/A
SPXXF - FMFP
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PNBI - FMFP
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CBTN - FMFP
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ASCN - FMFP
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.46%
ERKH - FMFP
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.16%