Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ASCZX vs WCMLX
ASCZX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts ASCZX vs WCMLX
Alger Small Cap Growth Z
Price$10.83
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets196.15M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.10
Change+$0.15 (+1.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.68M
ASCZX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ASCZX vs. WCMLX commentary
Jul 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASCZX is a Buy and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ASCZX has more cash in the bank: 196M vs. WCMLX (43.7M). ASCZX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . ASCZX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: ASCZX (15 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than ASCZX (1.03). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. ASCZX (49.68). WCMLX has a lower initial minimum investment than ASCZX: WCMLX (100000) vs ASCZX (500000). ASCZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.74 vs. WCMLX (0.23). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 22.98 vs. ASCZX (-12.93).
| ASCZX | WCMLX | ASCZX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.99 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.79 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.258 | 0.700 | -323% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 100000 | 500% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 196M | 43.7M | 449% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.74 | 0.23 | 2,043% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.76 | 21.94 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | -12.93 | 22.98 | -56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.52 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers