Ad is loading...
ASCZX vs WCMLX
ASCZX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts ASCZX vs WCMLX
Alger Small Cap Growth Z
Price$9.40
Change+$0.22 (+2.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets178.85M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$11.80
Change+$0.13 (+1.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.14M
ASCZX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ASCZX vs. WCMLX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASCZX is a Buy and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ASCZX has more cash in the bank: 179M vs. WCMLX (42.1M). ASCZX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . ASCZX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: ASCZX (14 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.86) is less costly to investors than ASCZX (1.03). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. ASCZX (49.68). WCMLX has a lower initial minimum investment than ASCZX: WCMLX (100000) vs ASCZX (500000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.86 vs. ASCZX (-10.18). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 21.31 vs. ASCZX (-14.71).
| ASCZX | WCMLX | ASCZX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.99 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.86 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -17.073 | -9.253 | 185% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 100000 | 500% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 179M | 42.1M | 425% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.18 | -6.86 | 148% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.58 | 15.89 | 16% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.71 | 21.31 | -69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.24 | N/A | - |