Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ASCZX vs WCMLX
ASCZX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts ASCZX vs WCMLX
Alger Small Cap Growth Z
Price$11.15
Change+$0.10 (+0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets193.98M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.58
Change+$0.21 (+1.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.58M
ASCZX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ASCZX vs. WCMLX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASCZX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ASCZX has more cash in the bank: 194M vs. WCMLX (44.6M). ASCZX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . ASCZX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: ASCZX (15 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than ASCZX (1.03). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. ASCZX (49.68). WCMLX has a lower initial minimum investment than ASCZX: WCMLX (100000) vs ASCZX (500000). ASCZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.83 vs. WCMLX (6.59). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 20.93 vs. ASCZX (-10.63).
| ASCZX | WCMLX | ASCZX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.99 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.79 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.723 | 5.599 | 13% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 100000 | 500% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 194M | 44.6M | 435% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.83 | 6.59 | 119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.15 | 28.23 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.63 | 20.93 | -51% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.97 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers