Ad is loading...
ASCZX vs WCMLX
ASCZX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts ASCZX vs WCMLX
Alger Small Cap Growth Z
Price$8.60
Change+$0.01 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets174.46M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$10.81
Change+$0.10 (+0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets38.8M
ASCZX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ASCZX vs. WCMLX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASCZX is a Hold and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ASCZX has more cash in the bank: 174M vs. WCMLX (38.8M). ASCZX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . ASCZX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: ASCZX (14 years) vs WCMLX (5 years). WCMLX (1.86) is less costly to investors than ASCZX (0.99). ASCZX (49.68) and WCMLX (48.00) have comparable annual turnover. WCMLX has a lower initial minimum investment than ASCZX: WCMLX (100000) vs ASCZX (500000). WCMLX (-12.36) and ASCZX (-12.79) have marching annual gain over last year. WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 23.25 vs. ASCZX (-9.36).
| ASCZX | WCMLX | ASCZX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.99 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 1.86 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -22.403 | -16.719 | 134% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 100000 | 500% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 174M | 38.8M | 448% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.79 | -12.36 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | -20.99 | -8.07 | 260% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.36 | 23.25 | -40% |
| Returns for 10 years | -2.71 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...