Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ASCZX vs WCMLX
ASCZX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts ASCZX vs WCMLX
Alger Small Cap Growth Z
Price$11.31
Change+$0.15 (+1.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets184.09M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.15
Change+$0.06 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.26M
ASCZX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ASCZX vs. WCMLX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASCZX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ASCZX has more cash in the bank: 184M vs. WCMLX (41.3M). ASCZX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . ASCZX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: ASCZX (15 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than ASCZX (1.03). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. ASCZX (49.68). WCMLX has a lower initial minimum investment than ASCZX: WCMLX (100000) vs ASCZX (500000). ASCZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.06 vs. WCMLX (-3.04). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -0.83 vs. ASCZX (-21.91).
| ASCZX | WCMLX | ASCZX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.99 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.79 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.813 | 1.788 | 45% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 100000 | 500% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 184M | 41.3M | 446% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.06 | -3.04 | 35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.33 | 21.43 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | -21.91 | -0.83 | 2,629% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.60 | N/A | - |