ASEKF
Price
$11.52
Change
-$0.52 (-4.32%)
Updated
Nov 8 closing price
Capitalization
8.84B
BRDCY
Price
$16.75
Change
-$0.16 (-0.95%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
28.65B
29 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

ASEKF vs BRDCY

Header iconASEKF vs BRDCY Comparison
Open Charts ASEKF vs BRDCYBanner chart's image
Aisin
Price$11.52
Change-$0.52 (-4.32%)
Volume$7.03K
Capitalization8.84B
Bridgestone
Price$16.75
Change-$0.16 (-0.95%)
Volume$178.25K
Capitalization28.65B
ASEKF vs BRDCY Comparison Chart
Loading...
BRDCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ASEKF vs. BRDCY commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASEKF is a Hold and BRDCY is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (ASEKF: $11.52 vs. BRDCY: $16.75)
Brand notoriety: ASEKF and BRDCY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ASEKF: 100% vs. BRDCY: 63%
Market capitalization -- ASEKF: $8.84B vs. BRDCY: $28.65B
ASEKF [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $8.84B. BRDCY’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $28.65B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $52.56B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $5.52B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ASEKF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileBRDCY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ASEKF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • BRDCY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ASEKF is a better buy in the long-term than BRDCY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BRDCY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BRDCY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

ASEKF (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while BRDCY (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was +1.89% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +2.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.41%.

Reported Earning Dates

BRDCY is expected to report earnings on Feb 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (+2.51% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BRDCY($28.6B) has a higher market cap than ASEKF($8.84B). ASEKF has higher P/E ratio than BRDCY: ASEKF (28.49) vs BRDCY (12.11). ASEKF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. BRDCY (-0.179). BRDCY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 793B vs. ASEKF (367B). BRDCY has more cash in the bank: 526B vs. ASEKF (362B). BRDCY has less debt than ASEKF: BRDCY (802B) vs ASEKF (910B). ASEKF (4.4T) and BRDCY (4.26T) have equivalent revenues.
ASEKFBRDCYASEKF / BRDCY
Capitalization8.84B28.6B31%
EBITDA367B793B46%
Gain YTD0.000-0.179-
P/E Ratio28.4912.11235%
Revenue4.4T4.26T103%
Total Cash362B526B69%
Total Debt910B802B113%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ASEKF vs BRDCY: Fundamental Ratings
ASEKF
BRDCY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6293
SMR RATING
1..100
10063
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7076
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
980
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ASEKF's Valuation (13) in the null industry is in the same range as BRDCY (16). This means that ASEKF’s stock grew similarly to BRDCY’s over the last 12 months.

ASEKF's Profit vs Risk Rating (62) in the null industry is in the same range as BRDCY (93). This means that ASEKF’s stock grew similarly to BRDCY’s over the last 12 months.

BRDCY's SMR Rating (63) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ASEKF (100). This means that BRDCY’s stock grew somewhat faster than ASEKF’s over the last 12 months.

ASEKF's Price Growth Rating (70) in the null industry is in the same range as BRDCY (76). This means that ASEKF’s stock grew similarly to BRDCY’s over the last 12 months.

ASEKF's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BRDCY (80). This means that ASEKF’s stock grew significantly faster than BRDCY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ASEKFBRDCY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
51%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
13%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
14%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BRDCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JABNX46.180.25
+0.54%
Janus Henderson Balanced N
SPWIX33.630.13
+0.39%
SEI Small Cap Growth I (SIMT)
IMAIX9.360.03
+0.32%
Macquarie Multi-Asset Income I
PVEJX15.750.04
+0.25%
Principal MidCap Value I J
ETHSX13.12-0.13
-0.98%
Eaton Vance Worldwide Health Sci A

ASEKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ASEKF and EXCOF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ASEKF and EXCOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ASEKF
1D Price
Change %
ASEKF100%
N/A
EXCOF - ASEKF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ADNT - ASEKF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.06%
BRDCY - ASEKF
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.95%
DNZOF - ASEKF
3%
Poorly correlated
-11.79%
BRDCF - ASEKF
-0%
Poorly correlated
-5.98%
More

BRDCY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BRDCY has been loosely correlated with DNZOY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BRDCY jumps, then DNZOY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BRDCY
1D Price
Change %
BRDCY100%
-0.95%
DNZOY - BRDCY
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.59%
SMTOY - BRDCY
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.50%
MOD - BRDCY
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.19%
DAN - BRDCY
33%
Loosely correlated
+0.47%
GT - BRDCY
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.85%
More