ASEKF
Price
$10.08
Change
-$1.44 (-12.50%)
Updated
Apr 4 closing price
Capitalization
8.84B
CMMCF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Mar 24 closing price
Capitalization
21.35M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ASEKF vs CMMCF

Header iconASEKF vs CMMCF Comparison
Open Charts ASEKF vs CMMCFBanner chart's image
Aisin
Price$10.08
Change-$1.44 (-12.50%)
Volume$100
Capitalization8.84B
Oxe Marine AB
Price$0.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$30K
Capitalization21.35M
ASEKF vs CMMCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CMMCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ASEKF vs. CMMCF commentary
Jul 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASEKF is a Hold and CMMCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2025
Stock price -- (ASEKF: $10.08 vs. CMMCF: $0.02)
Brand notoriety: ASEKF and CMMCF are both not notable
ASEKF represents the Auto Parts: OEM, while CMMCF is part of the Aerospace & Defense industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ASEKF: 100% vs. CMMCF: 100%
Market capitalization -- ASEKF: $8.84B vs. CMMCF: $21.35M
ASEKF [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $8.84B. CMMCF’s [@Aerospace & Defense] market capitalization is $21.35M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $52.56B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Aerospace & Defense] industry ranges from $263.27B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $5.73B. The average market capitalization across the [@Aerospace & Defense] industry is $20.3B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ASEKF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCMMCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ASEKF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CMMCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both ASEKF and CMMCF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMMCF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CMMCF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.

Price Growth

ASEKF (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CMMCF (@Aerospace & Defense) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +3.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.37%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Aerospace & Defense industry was +1.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was +43.99%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (+3.35% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

@Aerospace & Defense (+1.15% weekly)

Aerospace & Defense is one of largest industries in the U.S., mainly comprising the following areas: commercial airliners, military aircraft, missiles, space, and general aviation. Focused heavily on research & development, it is also one of the fastest growing industries. Military aircraft has the largest market share in the industry’s sales, followed by space systems, civil aircraft, and missiles. Aerospace exports, directly and indirectly, support more jobs than the export of any other commodity, according to a study by the U.S. Department of Commerce. Boeing Company, Lockheed Martin Corporation and General Electric Company are some of the most prominent players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ASEKF($8.84B) has a higher market cap than CMMCF($21.4M). ASEKF YTD gains are higher at: -12.538 vs. CMMCF (-32.143). ASEKF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 367B vs. CMMCF (-43.43M). ASEKF has more cash in the bank: 362B vs. CMMCF (15.2M). CMMCF has less debt than ASEKF: CMMCF (48.9M) vs ASEKF (910B). ASEKF has higher revenues than CMMCF: ASEKF (4.4T) vs CMMCF (185M).
ASEKFCMMCFASEKF / CMMCF
Capitalization8.84B21.4M41,290%
EBITDA367B-43.43M-845,057%
Gain YTD-12.538-32.14339%
P/E Ratio28.49N/A-
Revenue4.4T185M2,380,000%
Total Cash362B15.2M2,381,579%
Total Debt910B48.9M1,860,941%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ASEKF: Fundamental Ratings
ASEKF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
39
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
10
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
97
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
79
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
91
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
45

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ASEKFCMMCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
11%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
30%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
11%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
28%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CMMCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KOMP55.700.70
+1.27%
SPDR® S&P Kensho New Economies Comps ETF
SEPZ40.220.28
+0.71%
TrueShares Structured Outcome Sep ETF
DGT152.280.50
+0.33%
SPDR® Global Dow ETF
GGM26.10N/A
N/A
GGM Macro Alignment ETF
RZC25.35-0.04
-0.16%
Reinsurance Group of America

ASEKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ASEKF and EXCOF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ASEKF and EXCOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ASEKF
1D Price
Change %
ASEKF100%
N/A
EXCOF - ASEKF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ADNT - ASEKF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.90%
BRDCY - ASEKF
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.48%
DNZOF - ASEKF
3%
Poorly correlated
-4.79%
BRDCF - ASEKF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CMMCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CMMCF and ASEKY have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CMMCF and ASEKY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMMCF
1D Price
Change %
CMMCF100%
N/A
ASEKY - CMMCF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BRDCF - CMMCF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DNZOF - CMMCF
3%
Poorly correlated
-4.79%
BRBOF - CMMCF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ASEKF - CMMCF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More