It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ASFT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSQNNY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ASFT’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SQNNY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
ASFT (@Packaged Software) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SQNNY (@Electronics/Appliances) price change was +21.40% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.47%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronics/Appliances industry was -1.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.90%.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
@Electronics/Appliances (-1.65% weekly)TVs, telephones, washing machines, home speakers and even home-office equipment like computers and printers…the list is virtually endless when it comes to consumer electronics and appliances. And, with ‘smarthomes’ increasingly becoming the reality, we could see a sharp surge in high-tech gadgets (including robotic appliances) making their way into our homes– and therefore spelling plenty opportunities in the related industries. Consumers account for 70% of US GDP, and their purchases of high-functioning electronics could make significant dents in the economy’s health. Sony Corp., Whirlpool and iRobot are some of the major consumer electronics/appliances makers.
ASFT | SQNNY | ASFT / SQNNY | |
Capitalization | 1.1M | 9.29B | 0% |
EBITDA | -62.82K | 18.8B | -0% |
Gain YTD | -2.778 | 95.595 | -3% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | 55.90 | - |
Revenue | 0 | 342B | - |
Total Cash | 76 | 222B | 0% |
Total Debt | 466K | N/A | - |
ASFT | SQNNY | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 93 | 37 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 98 Overvalued | 41 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 49 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 11 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 74 | 36 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 11 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SQNNY's Valuation (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ASFT (98). This means that SQNNY’s stock grew somewhat faster than ASFT’s over the last 12 months.
SQNNY's Profit vs Risk Rating (49) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ASFT (100). This means that SQNNY’s stock grew somewhat faster than ASFT’s over the last 12 months.
SQNNY's SMR Rating (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ASFT (100). This means that SQNNY’s stock grew significantly faster than ASFT’s over the last 12 months.
SQNNY's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ASFT (74). This means that SQNNY’s stock grew somewhat faster than ASFT’s over the last 12 months.
SQNNY's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ASFT (100). This means that SQNNY’s stock grew significantly faster than ASFT’s over the last 12 months.
ASFT | SQNNY | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago60% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago67% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago5% | 2 days ago54% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago53% | 2 days ago53% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago22% | 2 days ago52% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago28% | 2 days ago51% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago45% |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago54% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
FLMB | 22.90 | 0.05 | +0.23% |
Franklin Municipal Green Bond ETF | |||
LJAN | 24.71 | 0.04 | +0.16% |
Innovator Premium Income 15 Buf ETF -Jan | |||
NBGX | 27.24 | N/A | N/A |
Neuberger Berman Growth ETF | |||
XOP | 124.52 | -0.63 | -0.50% |
SPDR® S&P Oil & Gas Explor & Prodtn ETF | |||
ATMP | 28.88 | -0.23 | -0.79% |
Barclays ETN+ Select MLP |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ASFT has been loosely correlated with UPLD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ASFT jumps, then UPLD could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ASFT | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ASFT | 100% | N/A | ||
UPLD - ASFT | 37% Loosely correlated | -0.54% | ||
CCOEF - ASFT | 32% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
SQNNY - ASFT | 28% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
BHAT - ASFT | 26% Poorly correlated | -4.47% | ||
CCOEY - ASFT | 23% Poorly correlated | +3.42% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SQNNY has been loosely correlated with SQNXF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SQNNY jumps, then SQNXF could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SQNNY | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
SQNNY | 100% | N/A | ||
SQNXF - SQNNY | 43% Loosely correlated | -1.15% | ||
RKNEF - SQNNY | 33% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
ASFT - SQNNY | 28% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
JAMF - SQNNY | 25% Poorly correlated | -0.94% | ||
CCOEY - SQNNY | 23% Poorly correlated | +3.42% | ||
More |