Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ASHR vs ECNS
ASHR vs ECNS Comparison
Open Charts ASHR vs ECNS
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A ETF
Price$31.93
Change+$0.20 (+0.63%)
Volume$83.25K
Net Assets2.13B
iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF
Price$37.94
Change+$0.45 (+1.20%)
Volume$100
Net Assets77.77M
ASHR vs ECNS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ASHR vs. ECNS commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASHR is a Buy and ECNS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ASHR has more net assets: 2.13B vs. ECNS (77.8M). ECNS has a higher annual dividend yield than ASHR: ECNS (49.631) vs ASHR (19.872). ASHR was incepted earlier than ECNS: ASHR (12 years) vs ECNS (15 years). ECNS (0.59) has a lower expense ratio than ASHR (0.65). ASHR has a higher turnover ECNS (61.00) vs ECNS (61.00).
| ASHR | ECNS | ASHR / ECNS | |
| Gain YTD | 19.872 | 49.631 | 40% |
| Net Assets | 2.13B | 77.8M | 2,738% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.59 | 110% |
| Turnover | 143.00 | 61.00 | 234% |
| Yield | 1.05 | 4.67 | 22% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| ASHR | ECNS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 8 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 29 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 87% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| DRUP | 63.87 | 1.11 | +1.77% |
| GraniteShares Nasdaq Sel Disruptors ETF | |||
| PCCE | 13.64 | 0.05 | +0.35% |
| Polen Capital China Growth ETF | |||
| SLVR | 33.98 | 0.06 | +0.18% |
| Sprott Silver Mnrs & Physical Silver ETF | |||
| IAPR | 29.79 | 0.03 | +0.09% |
| Innovator Intl Dev Pwr Bffr ETF Apr | |||
| FLDR | 50.16 | 0.04 | +0.07% |
| Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF | |||
ECNS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ECNS has been closely correlated with WB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ECNS jumps, then WB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ECNS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ECNS | 100% | -0.21% | ||
| WB - ECNS | 66% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| LU - ECNS | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.99% | ||
| NOAH - ECNS | 61% Loosely correlated | -4.22% | ||
| IQ - ECNS | 59% Loosely correlated | +6.36% | ||
| TIGR - ECNS | 57% Loosely correlated | +10.72% | ||
More | ||||