ASHTF
Price
$64.93
Change
+$0.05 (+0.08%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
ZIZTF
Price
$1.98
Change
+$0.16 (+8.79%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
Ad is loading...

ASHTF vs ZIZTF

Header iconASHTF vs ZIZTF Comparison
Open Charts ASHTF vs ZIZTFBanner chart's image
Ashtead Group
Price$64.93
Change+$0.05 (+0.08%)
Volume$13.95K
CapitalizationN/A
Zip
Price$1.98
Change+$0.16 (+8.79%)
Volume$2.55K
CapitalizationN/A
ASHTF vs ZIZTF Comparison Chart
Loading...
ASHTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ZIZTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ASHTF vs. ZIZTF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASHTF is a Hold and ZIZTF is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (ASHTF: $64.93 vs. ZIZTF: $1.98)
Brand notoriety: ASHTF and ZIZTF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ASHTF: 85% vs. ZIZTF: 63%
Market capitalization -- ASHTF: $32.45B vs. ZIZTF: $521.77M
ASHTF [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $32.45B. ZIZTF’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $521.77M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $12.41B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ASHTF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileZIZTF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ASHTF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ZIZTF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ASHTF is a better buy in the long-term than ZIZTF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ASHTF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZIZTF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ASHTF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • ZIZTF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ASHTF is a better buy in the short-term than ZIZTF.

Price Growth

ASHTF (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а -4.50% price change this week, while ZIZTF (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was +3.77% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was -3.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.59%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (-3.13% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ASHTF($32.4B) has a higher market cap than ZIZTF($522M). ZIZTF YTD gains are higher at: 331.338 vs. ASHTF (-6.394). ASHTF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.41B vs. ZIZTF (-846.98M). ZIZTF has more cash in the bank: 34.2M vs. ASHTF (29.9M). ZIZTF has less debt than ASHTF: ZIZTF (1.09B) vs ASHTF (8.99B). ASHTF has higher revenues than ZIZTF: ASHTF (9.67B) vs ZIZTF (670M).
ASHTFZIZTFASHTF / ZIZTF
Capitalization32.4B522M6,207%
EBITDA4.41B-846.98M-520%
Gain YTD-6.394331.338-2%
P/E Ratio20.49N/A-
Revenue9.67B670M1,443%
Total Cash29.9M34.2M87%
Total Debt8.99B1.09B825%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ASHTF: Fundamental Ratings
ASHTF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
52
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
41
SMR RATING
1..100
40
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
79
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
65
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ASHTFZIZTF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
47%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ASHTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ZIZTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SQQQ31.103.03
+10.79%
ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ
GTIP48.39-0.28
-0.59%
Goldman Sachs Acs Infl Protd USD Bd ETF
QMAR29.80-0.41
-1.37%
FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF – Mar
GABF46.16-1.72
-3.59%
Gabelli Financial Services Opp ETF
FYLG27.95-1.08
-3.70%
Global X Financials Covered Cll&Gr ETF

ASHTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ASHTF has been closely correlated with ASHTY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ASHTF jumps, then ASHTY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ASHTF
1D Price
Change %
ASHTF100%
+0.08%
ASHTY - ASHTF
75%
Closely correlated
-0.53%
URI - ASHTF
51%
Loosely correlated
-4.51%
HEES - ASHTF
43%
Loosely correlated
-6.94%
HRI - ASHTF
40%
Loosely correlated
-4.60%
WD - ASHTF
38%
Loosely correlated
-6.77%
More

ZIZTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ZIZTF and MAMTF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ZIZTF and MAMTF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ZIZTF
1D Price
Change %
ZIZTF100%
+8.90%
MAMTF - ZIZTF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ASHTF - ZIZTF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.08%
OPFI - ZIZTF
9%
Poorly correlated
-5.19%
LFLS - ZIZTF
4%
Poorly correlated
+34.31%
AIFLF - ZIZTF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More