ASHXF vs ATCMF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASHXF is a Hold and ATCMF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ASHXF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileATCMF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- ASHXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- ATCMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Price Growth
ASHXF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while ATCMF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +57.50% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +1.82%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.85%.
Reported Earning Dates
ATCMF is expected to report earnings on Aug 19, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Other Metals/Minerals (+1.82% weekly)The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.
| ASHXF | ATCMF | ASHXF / ATCMF | |
| Capitalization | 7.73M | 17.8M | 43% |
| EBITDA | 936K | 14.3M | 7% |
| Gain YTD | -13.885 | 20.441 | -68% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 3.72 | - |
| Revenue | 20M | 57.3M | 35% |
| Total Cash | 344K | 15.2M | 2% |
| Total Debt | 9.07M | 23.8M | 38% |
ASHXF | ATCMF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 41 | 36 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 67 Overvalued | 45 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 78 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 77 | 91 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 37 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 76 | 34 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ATCMF's Valuation (45) in the null industry is in the same range as ASHXF (67). This means that ATCMF’s stock grew similarly to ASHXF’s over the last 12 months.
ASHXF's Profit vs Risk Rating (78) in the null industry is in the same range as ATCMF (100). This means that ASHXF’s stock grew similarly to ATCMF’s over the last 12 months.
ASHXF's SMR Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as ATCMF (91). This means that ASHXF’s stock grew similarly to ATCMF’s over the last 12 months.
ATCMF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as ASHXF (48). This means that ATCMF’s stock grew similarly to ASHXF’s over the last 12 months.
ATCMF's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ASHXF (76). This means that ATCMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ASHXF’s over the last 12 months.
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| PCQ | 8.52 | 0.06 | +0.71% |
| Pimco California Municipal Income Fund | |||
| AUGZ | 36.97 | 0.15 | +0.41% |
| TrueShares Structured Outcome August ETF | |||
| HYMB | 24.66 | 0.06 | +0.24% |
| SPDR® Nuveen Blmbg Hi Yld Muncpl Bd ETF | |||
| VICE | 31.21 | N/A | N/A |
| AdvisorShares Vice ETF | |||
| HMOP | 38.04 | -0.05 | -0.13% |
| Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF | |||
ASHXF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ASHXF has been loosely correlated with ZZZOF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ASHXF jumps, then ZZZOF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ASHXF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASHXF | 100% | N/A | ||
| ZZZOF - ASHXF | 34% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| AXVEF - ASHXF | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| NBMFF - ASHXF | 20% Poorly correlated | +20.00% | ||
| ATAO - ASHXF | 5% Poorly correlated | +15.43% | ||
| ATCMF - ASHXF | 4% Poorly correlated | -9.00% | ||
More | ||||
ATCMF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that ATCMF and ALLIF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ATCMF and ALLIF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ATCMF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATCMF | 100% | -9.00% | ||
| ALLIF - ATCMF | 23% Poorly correlated | -5.74% | ||
| TLGRF - ATCMF | 21% Poorly correlated | +2.17% | ||
| ATBHF - ATCMF | 6% Poorly correlated | -4.76% | ||
| ASHXF - ATCMF | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ATOXF - ATCMF | 3% Poorly correlated | -21.65% | ||
More | ||||