ASHXF
Price
$0.12
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
7.73M
NBMFF
Price
$0.37
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
28.25M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ASHXF vs NBMFF

Header iconASHXF vs NBMFF Comparison
Open Charts ASHXF vs NBMFFBanner chart's image
Progressive Planet Solutions
Price$0.12
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100K
Capitalization7.73M
NEO Battery Materials
Price$0.37
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$18.11K
Capitalization28.25M
ASHXF vs NBMFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ASHXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NBMFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ASHXF vs. NBMFF commentary
Jul 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASHXF is a Buy and NBMFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2025
Stock price -- (ASHXF: $0.12 vs. NBMFF: $0.37)
Brand notoriety: ASHXF and NBMFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ASHXF: 267% vs. NBMFF: 294%
Market capitalization -- ASHXF: $7.73M vs. NBMFF: $28.25M
ASHXF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $7.73M. NBMFF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $28.25M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ASHXF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNBMFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ASHXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NBMFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both ASHXF and NBMFF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ASHXF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NBMFF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ASHXF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • NBMFF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ASHXF is a better buy in the short-term than NBMFF.

Price Growth

ASHXF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while NBMFF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -7.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.02%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.12% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NBMFF($28.2M) has a higher market cap than ASHXF($7.73M). ASHXF YTD gains are higher at: -4.459 vs. NBMFF (-32.727). ASHXF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 936K vs. NBMFF (-1.95M). NBMFF has more cash in the bank: 1.09M vs. ASHXF (344K). NBMFF has less debt than ASHXF: NBMFF (0) vs ASHXF (9.07M). ASHXF has higher revenues than NBMFF: ASHXF (20M) vs NBMFF (0).
ASHXFNBMFFASHXF / NBMFF
Capitalization7.73M28.2M27%
EBITDA936K-1.95M-48%
Gain YTD-4.459-32.72714%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue20M0-
Total Cash344K1.09M32%
Total Debt9.07M0-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ASHXF vs NBMFF: Fundamental Ratings
ASHXF
NBMFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4928
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
68
Overvalued
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8070
SMR RATING
1..100
7699
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4539
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
77100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ASHXF's Valuation (68) in the null industry is in the same range as NBMFF (88). This means that ASHXF’s stock grew similarly to NBMFF’s over the last 12 months.

NBMFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (70) in the null industry is in the same range as ASHXF (80). This means that NBMFF’s stock grew similarly to ASHXF’s over the last 12 months.

ASHXF's SMR Rating (76) in the null industry is in the same range as NBMFF (99). This means that ASHXF’s stock grew similarly to NBMFF’s over the last 12 months.

NBMFF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as ASHXF (45). This means that NBMFF’s stock grew similarly to ASHXF’s over the last 12 months.

ASHXF's P/E Growth Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as NBMFF (100). This means that ASHXF’s stock grew similarly to NBMFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ASHXFNBMFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ASHXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NBMFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
REDLF0.240.01
+2.35%
VAULT MINERALS LTD
NPPTF1.040.01
+0.97%
Neptune Digital Assets Corp.
ACKAY15.86N/A
N/A
Arcelik A.S.
SWGNF35.78N/A
N/A
Swatch Group AG
MSEZ0.06N/A
N/A
Media Sentiment, Inc.

ASHXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ASHXF has been loosely correlated with ZZZOF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ASHXF jumps, then ZZZOF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ASHXF
1D Price
Change %
ASHXF100%
N/A
ZZZOF - ASHXF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
AXVEF - ASHXF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NBMFF - ASHXF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ATCMF - ASHXF
4%
Poorly correlated
+2.10%
ASDRF - ASHXF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

NBMFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NBMFF and ASHXF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NBMFF and ASHXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NBMFF
1D Price
Change %
NBMFF100%
N/A
ASHXF - NBMFF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VLTLF - NBMFF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.93%
ECRAF - NBMFF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AUMC - NBMFF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OMHLF - NBMFF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More