Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ASIA vs EEMA
ASIA vs EEMA Comparison
Open Charts ASIA vs EEMA
Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF
Price$34.57
Change+$0.42 (+1.23%)
Volume$100
Net Assets42.65M
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF
Price$94.14
Change+$0.57 (+0.61%)
Volume$418
Net Assets1.56B
ASIA vs EEMA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ASIA vs. EEMA commentary
Oct 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASIA is a Buy and EEMA is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EEMA has more net assets: 1.56B vs. ASIA (42.7M). EEMA (30.901) and ASIA (30.561) have matching annual dividend yield . ASIA was incepted earlier than EEMA: ASIA (2 years) vs EEMA (14 years). EEMA (0.49) has a lower expense ratio than ASIA (0.79). ASIA has a higher turnover EEMA (7.00) vs EEMA (7.00).
| ASIA | EEMA | ASIA / EEMA | |
| Gain YTD | 30.561 | 30.901 | 99% |
| Net Assets | 42.7M | 1.56B | 3% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.49 | 161% |
| Turnover | 451.30 | 7.00 | 6,447% |
| Yield | 0.46 | 1.30 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 14 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| ASIA | EEMA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 69% | 11 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
ASIA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that ASIA and SM have been poorly correlated (+19% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ASIA and SM's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ASIA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASIA | 100% | +0.46% | ||
| SM - ASIA | 19% Poorly correlated | +4.40% | ||
| TSM - ASIA | 14% Poorly correlated | +1.42% | ||
| SE - ASIA | 9% Poorly correlated | +0.37% | ||
| INFY - ASIA | 9% Poorly correlated | +0.50% | ||
| JD - ASIA | 6% Poorly correlated | -1.61% | ||
More | ||||
EEMA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EEMA has been closely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EEMA jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EEMA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EEMA | 100% | +0.22% | ||
| BABA - EEMA | 79% Closely correlated | -0.69% | ||
| KC - EEMA | 72% Closely correlated | -2.24% | ||
| BILI - EEMA | 71% Closely correlated | -1.32% | ||
| JD - EEMA | 70% Closely correlated | -1.61% | ||
| BIDU - EEMA | 67% Closely correlated | +1.26% | ||
More | ||||