Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ASLAX vs NLSCX
ASLAX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts ASLAX vs NLSCX
AB Select US Long/Short A
Price$14.42
Change+$0.02 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.48B
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.14
Change-$0.02 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.35B
ASLAX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ASLAX vs. NLSCX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASLAX is a Buy and NLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.35B vs. ASLAX (1.48B). ASLAX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: ASLAX (0.47) vs NLSCX (0.00). ASLAX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: ASLAX (12 years) vs NLSCX (13 years). NLSCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than ASLAX (2.01). ASLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 242.00 vs. NLSCX (48.00). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ASLAX: NLSCX (1000) vs ASLAX (2500). NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.45 vs. ASLAX (2.01). NLSCX return over 5 years is better than : 24.88 vs. ASLAX (20.17).
| ASLAX | NLSCX | ASLAX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 2.43 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 2.43 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.348 | 2.657 | 13% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.48B | 7.35B | 20% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.01 | 6.45 | 31% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.76 | 13.57 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.17 | 24.88 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.00 | 32.51 | 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement