Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ASLAX vs NLSCX
ASLAX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts ASLAX vs NLSCX
AB Select US Long/Short A
Price$15.12
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.54B
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.44
Change-$0.02 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.52B
ASLAX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ASLAX vs. NLSCX commentary
Jul 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASLAX is a Buy and NLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.52B vs. ASLAX (1.54B). ASLAX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: ASLAX (0.44) vs NLSCX (0.00). ASLAX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: ASLAX (13 years) vs NLSCX (14 years). NLSCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than ASLAX (2.01). ASLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 242.00 vs. NLSCX (48.00). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ASLAX: NLSCX (1000) vs ASLAX (2500). NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.72 vs. ASLAX (4.32). NLSCX return over 5 years is better than : 21.52 vs. ASLAX (19.23).
| ASLAX | NLSCX | ASLAX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 2.43 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 2.43 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.366 | 4.353 | 123% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.54B | 7.52B | 21% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.32 | 8.72 | 50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.78 | 12.63 | 133% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.23 | 21.52 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.07 | 37.05 | 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement