ASM
Price
$3.56
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 6, 04:38 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
98.38M
61 days until earnings call
MWSNF
Price
$4.46
Change
+$0.03 (+0.68%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Capitalization
31.14M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ASM vs MWSNF

Header iconASM vs MWSNF Comparison
Open Charts ASM vs MWSNFBanner chart's image
Avino Silver & Gold Mines
Price$3.56
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2.71K
Capitalization98.38M
SOUTHERN CROSS GOLD CONS
Price$4.46
Change+$0.03 (+0.68%)
Volume$107.07K
Capitalization31.14M
ASM vs MWSNF Comparison Chart
Loading...
ASM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ASM vs. MWSNF commentary
Jun 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASM is a Buy and MWSNF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 06, 2025
Stock price -- (ASM: $3.56 vs. MWSNF: $4.46)
Brand notoriety: ASM and MWSNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ASM: 203% vs. MWSNF: 144%
Market capitalization -- ASM: $98.38M vs. MWSNF: $31.14M
ASM [@Precious Metals] is valued at $98.38M. MWSNF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $31.14M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ASM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMWSNF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ASM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MWSNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both ASM and MWSNF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ASM’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • ASM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

ASM (@Precious Metals) experienced а +13.74% price change this week, while MWSNF (@Precious Metals) price change was +14.17% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +7.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was +47.22%.

Reported Earning Dates

ASM is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

MWSNF is expected to report earnings on Apr 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+7.30% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ASM($98.4M) has a higher market cap than MWSNF($31.1M). MWSNF has higher P/E ratio than ASM: MWSNF (416.67) vs ASM (174.88). ASM YTD gains are higher at: 304.086 vs. MWSNF (101.193). ASM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.57M vs. MWSNF (-6.05M). MWSNF has more cash in the bank: 18M vs. ASM (1.86M). MWSNF has less debt than ASM: MWSNF (229K) vs ASM (3.54M). ASM has higher revenues than MWSNF: ASM (46M) vs MWSNF (0).
ASMMWSNFASM / MWSNF
Capitalization98.4M31.1M316%
EBITDA4.57M-6.05M-76%
Gain YTD304.086101.193301%
P/E Ratio174.88416.6742%
Revenue46M0-
Total Cash1.86M18M10%
Total Debt3.54M229K1,547%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ASM vs MWSNF: Fundamental Ratings
ASM
MWSNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2328
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
96
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
155
SMR RATING
1..100
7996
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3435
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9684
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ASM's Valuation (84) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as MWSNF (96) in the null industry. This means that ASM’s stock grew similarly to MWSNF’s over the last 12 months.

MWSNF's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the null industry is in the same range as ASM (15) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that MWSNF’s stock grew similarly to ASM’s over the last 12 months.

ASM's SMR Rating (79) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as MWSNF (96) in the null industry. This means that ASM’s stock grew similarly to MWSNF’s over the last 12 months.

ASM's Price Growth Rating (34) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as MWSNF (35) in the null industry. This means that ASM’s stock grew similarly to MWSNF’s over the last 12 months.

MWSNF's P/E Growth Rating (84) in the null industry is in the same range as ASM (96) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that MWSNF’s stock grew similarly to ASM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ASM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ASM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPY593.05-2.88
-0.48%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
AAPL200.63-2.19
-1.08%
Apple
GME29.45-0.50
-1.67%
GameStop Corp
BTC.X101575.950000-3156.031200
-3.01%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA284.70-47.35
-14.26%
Tesla

MWSNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MWSNF and NEM have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MWSNF and NEM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MWSNF
1D Price
Change %
MWSNF100%
+0.74%
NEM - MWSNF
31%
Poorly correlated
-1.39%
EQX - MWSNF
30%
Poorly correlated
+2.81%
ORLA - MWSNF
30%
Poorly correlated
+7.95%
CGAU - MWSNF
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.40%
ASM - MWSNF
29%
Poorly correlated
+3.19%
More