ASM
Price
$1.20
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 4 closing price
7 days until earnings call
OCGSF
Price
$0.18
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 4 closing price
Ad is loading...

ASM vs OCGSF

Header iconASM vs OCGSF Comparison
Open Charts ASM vs OCGSFBanner chart's image
Avino Silver & Gold Mines
Price$1.20
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2.05M
CapitalizationN/A
Outcrop Gold & Silver
Price$0.18
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$141.97K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
ASM vs OCGSF Comparison Chart
Loading...
ASM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
OCGSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
ASM vs. OCGSF commentary
Nov 06, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASM is a Buy and OCGSF is a StrongSell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 06, 2024
Stock price -- (ASM: $1.20 vs. OCGSF: $0.18)
Brand notoriety: ASM and OCGSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ASM: 138% vs. OCGSF: 38%
Market capitalization -- ASM: $98.38M vs. OCGSF: $32.09M
ASM [@Precious Metals] is valued at $98.38M. OCGSF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $32.09M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ASM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileOCGSF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ASM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • OCGSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ASM is a better buy in the long-term than OCGSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ASM’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OCGSF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ASM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • OCGSF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OCGSF is a better buy in the short-term than ASM.

Price Growth

ASM (@Precious Metals) experienced а -15.49% price change this week, while OCGSF (@Precious Metals) price change was -17.78% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -2.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.99%.

Reported Earning Dates

ASM is expected to report earnings on Feb 27, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-2.92% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ASM($98.4M) has a higher market cap than OCGSF($32.1M). ASM YTD gains are higher at: 129.008 vs. OCGSF (17.492). ASM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.57M vs. OCGSF (-10.39M). OCGSF has more cash in the bank: 4.98M vs. ASM (1.86M). OCGSF has less debt than ASM: OCGSF (19.1K) vs ASM (3.54M). ASM has higher revenues than OCGSF: ASM (46M) vs OCGSF (0).
ASMOCGSFASM / OCGSF
Capitalization98.4M32.1M307%
EBITDA4.57M-10.39M-44%
Gain YTD129.00817.492738%
P/E Ratio174.88N/A-
Revenue46M0-
Total Cash1.86M4.98M37%
Total Debt3.54M19.1K18,550%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ASM vs OCGSF: Fundamental Ratings
ASM
OCGSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8071
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
93
Overvalued
59
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5883
SMR RATING
1..100
8897
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3548
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OCGSF's Valuation (59) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ASM (93) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that OCGSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ASM’s over the last 12 months.

ASM's Profit vs Risk Rating (58) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as OCGSF (83) in the null industry. This means that ASM’s stock grew similarly to OCGSF’s over the last 12 months.

ASM's SMR Rating (88) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as OCGSF (97) in the null industry. This means that ASM’s stock grew similarly to OCGSF’s over the last 12 months.

ASM's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as OCGSF (48) in the null industry. This means that ASM’s stock grew similarly to OCGSF’s over the last 12 months.

ASM's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Precious Metals industry is significantly better than the same rating for OCGSF (100) in the null industry. This means that ASM’s stock grew significantly faster than OCGSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ASMOCGSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
88%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ASM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
OCGSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IMPUY6.820.03
+0.44%
Impala Platinum Holdings Ltd.
SNMRY9.560.01
+0.10%
Snam S.p.A.
UMGNF25.05-0.63
-2.45%
UNIVERSAL MUSIC GROUP
PTHRF0.30-0.01
-3.21%
Pantheon Resources Plc
GPOX0.05-0.01
-18.38%
GPO PLUS INC.

ASM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ASM has been closely correlated with HL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ASM jumps, then HL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ASM
1D Price
Change %
ASM100%
-4.76%
HL - ASM
70%
Closely correlated
-1.25%
CDE - ASM
66%
Closely correlated
-2.11%
PAAS - ASM
66%
Closely correlated
-1.09%
MAG - ASM
65%
Loosely correlated
-1.79%
AEM - ASM
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.10%
More

OCGSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OCGSF has been loosely correlated with HL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OCGSF jumps, then HL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OCGSF
1D Price
Change %
OCGSF100%
+1.14%
HL - OCGSF
56%
Loosely correlated
-1.25%
PAAS - OCGSF
55%
Loosely correlated
-1.09%
MAG - OCGSF
53%
Loosely correlated
-1.79%
ASM - OCGSF
53%
Loosely correlated
-4.76%
EXK - OCGSF
53%
Loosely correlated
-2.05%
More