ASMMF
Price
$0.33
Change
-$0.03 (-8.33%)
Updated
May 21 closing price
Capitalization
177.65M
EMHLF
Price
$0.19
Change
+$0.04 (+26.67%)
Updated
May 14 closing price
Capitalization
121.16M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ASMMF vs EMHLF

Header iconASMMF vs EMHLF Comparison
Open Charts ASMMF vs EMHLFBanner chart's image
Australian Strategic Materials
Price$0.33
Change-$0.03 (-8.33%)
Volume$5K
Capitalization177.65M
European Metals Holdings
Price$0.19
Change+$0.04 (+26.67%)
Volume$12K
Capitalization121.16M
ASMMF vs EMHLF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ASMMF vs. EMHLF commentary
May 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASMMF is a Hold and EMHLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 23, 2025
Stock price -- (ASMMF: $0.33 vs. EMHLF: $0.19)
Brand notoriety: ASMMF and EMHLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ASMMF: 57% vs. EMHLF: 23%
Market capitalization -- ASMMF: $177.65M vs. EMHLF: $121.16M
ASMMF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $177.65M. EMHLF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $121.16M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.22B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ASMMF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileEMHLF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ASMMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • EMHLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ASMMF is a better buy in the long-term than EMHLF.

Price Growth

ASMMF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -5.31% price change this week, while EMHLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.46%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.21% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ASMMF($178M) has a higher market cap than EMHLF($121M). EMHLF YTD gains are higher at: 115.625 vs. ASMMF (-0.768). EMHLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -7.27M vs. ASMMF (-24.44M). ASMMF has higher revenues than EMHLF: ASMMF (1.87M) vs EMHLF (1.1M).
ASMMFEMHLFASMMF / EMHLF
Capitalization178M121M147%
EBITDA-24.44M-7.27M336%
Gain YTD-0.768115.625-1%
P/E RatioN/A28.82-
Revenue1.87M1.1M170%
Total CashN/A17.5M-
Total DebtN/A64K-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HEPS2.800.05
+1.82%
D-Market Electronic Services & Trading
RGCO21.00-0.29
-1.36%
RGC Resources
PRZO0.90-0.02
-1.94%
ParaZero Technologies Ltd
PGNY21.19-0.68
-3.11%
Progyny
IOT45.65-1.66
-3.51%
Samsara

EMHLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EMHLF and BTRYF have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EMHLF and BTRYF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EMHLF
1D Price
Change %
EMHLF100%
N/A
BTRYF - EMHLF
14%
Poorly correlated
+4.65%
YLLXF - EMHLF
5%
Poorly correlated
-3.35%
SMRVF - EMHLF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MP - EMHLF
3%
Poorly correlated
-5.52%
ASMMF - EMHLF
2%
Poorly correlated
-8.54%
More