ASMMF
Price
$0.40
Change
+$0.01 (+2.56%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
80.46M
EMHLF
Price
$0.14
Change
+$0.02 (+16.67%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
23M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ASMMF vs EMHLF

Header iconASMMF vs EMHLF Comparison
Open Charts ASMMF vs EMHLFBanner chart's image
Australian Strategic Materials
Price$0.40
Change+$0.01 (+2.56%)
Volume$11.15K
Capitalization80.46M
European Metals Holdings
Price$0.14
Change+$0.02 (+16.67%)
Volume$194.5K
Capitalization23M
ASMMF vs EMHLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ASMMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EMHLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ASMMF vs. EMHLF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASMMF is a Hold and EMHLF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (ASMMF: $0.40 vs. EMHLF: $0.14)
Brand notoriety: ASMMF and EMHLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ASMMF: 122% vs. EMHLF: 578%
Market capitalization -- ASMMF: $80.46M vs. EMHLF: $23M
ASMMF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $80.46M. EMHLF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $23M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.27B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ASMMF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileEMHLF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ASMMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • EMHLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ASMMF is a better buy in the long-term than EMHLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ASMMF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EMHLF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ASMMF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • EMHLF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EMHLF is a better buy in the short-term than ASMMF.

Price Growth

ASMMF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +8.11% price change this week, while EMHLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +121.49%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.77% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ASMMF($80.5M) has a higher market cap than EMHLF($23M). EMHLF YTD gains are higher at: 67.245 vs. ASMMF (20.281).
ASMMFEMHLFASMMF / EMHLF
Capitalization80.5M23M350%
EBITDA-25.57MN/A-
Gain YTD20.28167.24530%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue1.61MN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ASMMFEMHLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
64%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ASMMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EMHLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HLRTF0.07N/A
+3.73%
HILLCREST ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
FOSUF0.50N/A
N/A
Fosun International, Ltd.
NTTDF24.00N/A
N/A
NTT DATA GROUP CORPORATION
TSHTY9.80N/A
N/A
Toshiba Tec Corp.
CSLMF14.00N/A
N/A
CSLM Acquisition Corp.

ASMMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ASMMF and TGOLF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ASMMF and TGOLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ASMMF
1D Price
Change %
ASMMF100%
+2.46%
TGOLF - ASMMF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SGPTF - ASMMF
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.55%
PRMNF - ASMMF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.47%
FKMCF - ASMMF
18%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SMRVF - ASMMF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

EMHLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EMHLF and BTRYF have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EMHLF and BTRYF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EMHLF
1D Price
Change %
EMHLF100%
N/A
BTRYF - EMHLF
14%
Poorly correlated
-0.51%
SMRVF - EMHLF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MP - EMHLF
3%
Poorly correlated
-2.74%
ASMMF - EMHLF
2%
Poorly correlated
+2.46%
MKNGF - EMHLF
2%
Poorly correlated
+5.68%
More