It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ASMVF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNNOCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ASMVF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NNOCF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
ASMVF | NNOCF | ASMVF / NNOCF | |
Capitalization | 3.66B | 32.5M | 11,265% |
EBITDA | N/A | 466K | - |
Gain YTD | -32.394 | 37.074 | -87% |
P/E Ratio | 98.98 | 1.78 | 5,548% |
Revenue | N/A | 7.37M | - |
Total Cash | N/A | 15.5M | - |
Total Debt | N/A | 1.61M | - |
ASMVF | NNOCF | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 47 Fair valued | 37 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 92 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 70 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 37 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | 97 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 25 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NNOCF's Valuation (37) in the null industry is in the same range as ASMVF (47). This means that NNOCF’s stock grew similarly to ASMVF’s over the last 12 months.
NNOCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as ASMVF (100). This means that NNOCF’s stock grew similarly to ASMVF’s over the last 12 months.
ASMVF's SMR Rating (70) in the null industry is in the same range as NNOCF (100). This means that ASMVF’s stock grew similarly to NNOCF’s over the last 12 months.
NNOCF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as ASMVF (61). This means that NNOCF’s stock grew similarly to ASMVF’s over the last 12 months.
ASMVF's P/E Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NNOCF (97). This means that ASMVF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NNOCF’s over the last 12 months.
ASMVF | NNOCF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago64% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago21% | 3 days ago76% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago69% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago41% | 3 days ago50% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago27% | 3 days ago61% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago26% | 3 days ago62% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago79% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago25% | 3 days ago51% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
LYRBX | 28.34 | 0.23 | +0.82% |
Lyrical US Value Equity Investor | |||
RTDYX | 16.51 | 0.12 | +0.73% |
Russell Inv Multifactor US Equity Y | |||
SEFCX | 13.83 | 0.09 | +0.66% |
SEI International Equity Y (SIT) | |||
BLUEX | 39.63 | 0.02 | +0.05% |
AMG Veritas Global Real Return I | |||
RNEBX | 87.91 | -0.01 | -0.01% |
American Funds New World R2E |
A.I.dvisor tells us that ASMVF and NNOCF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ASMVF and NNOCF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ASMVF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ASMVF | 100% | N/A | ||
NNOCF - ASMVF | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
WKEY - ASMVF | 12% Poorly correlated | -1.30% | ||
ASMVY - ASMVF | 7% Poorly correlated | -0.34% | ||
ARRXF - ASMVF | 6% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
ASMLF - ASMVF | 3% Poorly correlated | +0.72% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that NNOCF and ASMVF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NNOCF and ASMVF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NNOCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
NNOCF | 100% | N/A | ||
ASMVF - NNOCF | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
LSRCF - NNOCF | 8% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
QNCCF - NNOCF | 7% Poorly correlated | +0.09% | ||
LSRCY - NNOCF | 5% Poorly correlated | +2.76% | ||
MCRNF - NNOCF | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |