Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ASMZX vs WCMLX
ASMZX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts ASMZX vs WCMLX
Alger Weatherbie Specialized Growth Z
Price$15.04
Change+$0.46 (+3.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets308.91M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.33
Change+$0.39 (+3.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.8M
ASMZX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ASMZX vs. WCMLX commentary
Nov 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASMZX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ASMZX has more cash in the bank: 309M vs. WCMLX (40.8M). ASMZX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . ASMZX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: ASMZX (15 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than ASMZX (0.96). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. ASMZX (46.68). WCMLX has a lower initial minimum investment than ASMZX: WCMLX (100000) vs ASMZX (500000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.75 vs. ASMZX (-8.30). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -1.97 vs. ASMZX (-30.21).
| ASMZX | WCMLX | ASMZX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.99 | 97% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.79 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.078 | 0.622 | -816% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 100000 | 500% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 309M | 40.8M | 757% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.30 | -5.75 | 144% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.71 | 19.93 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | -30.21 | -1.97 | 1,534% |
| Returns for 10 years | -15.72 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers