Advertisement
ASO vs ULH
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASO is a Buy and ULH is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ASO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileULH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- ASO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- ULH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ASO’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ULH’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ASO’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- ULH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
ASO (@Specialty Stores) experienced а +0.67% price change this week, while ULH (@Trucking) price change was -3.37% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -3.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.13%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Trucking industry was -2.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +39.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +31.54%.
Reported Earning Dates
ASO is expected to report earnings on Sep 04, 2025.
ULH is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Specialty Stores (-3.08% weekly)The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.
@Trucking (-2.80% weekly)The trucking industry provides road transportation delivery and logistical services, including moving large quantities of raw materials, works in process, and finished goods —often from manufacturing plants to retail distribution centers. Trucks are also used in the construction industry, as they transport large amounts of rocks, concrete, and other building materials used in construction. Trucks in the U.S. are responsible for the majority of freight movement over land, and therefore play an important role in the manufacturing, transportation, and warehousing industries. The business could be affected by economic cycles, since it is closely linked with manufacturing, retail and construction. Some of the major trucking companies in the U.S. are Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc., J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc., and XPO Logistics, Inc.
| ASO | ULH | ASO / ULH | |
| Capitalization | 5.03B | 642M | 783% |
| EBITDA | 820M | 290M | 283% |
| Gain YTD | -21.749 | -46.470 | 47% |
| P/E Ratio | 9.96 | 7.69 | 129% |
| Revenue | 6.16B | 1.74B | 355% |
| Total Cash | 348M | 32.6M | 1,067% |
| Total Debt | 1.7B | 839M | 202% |
ULH | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 11 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 28 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 66 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 58 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 86 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 67 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| ASO | ULH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 76% | 8 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 75% | 13 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 80% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | N/A |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SBB | 15.68 | 0.17 | +1.08% |
| ProShares Short SmallCap600 | |||
| FPFD | 21.39 | 0.02 | +0.09% |
| Fidelity Preferred Securities & Inc ETF | |||
| NXJ | 11.31 | -0.01 | -0.09% |
| Nuveen New Jersey Quality Municipal Income Fund | |||
| JSML | 65.78 | -0.54 | -0.81% |
| Janus Henderson Small Cap Gr Alpha ETF | |||
| INTF | 33.24 | -0.38 | -1.13% |
| iShares International Equity Factor ETF | |||
ULH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ULH has been loosely correlated with CVLG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ULH jumps, then CVLG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ULH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ULH | 100% | -0.61% | ||
| CVLG - ULH | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.95% | ||
| ARCB - ULH | 59% Loosely correlated | -1.93% | ||
| MRTN - ULH | 56% Loosely correlated | -1.82% | ||
| SNDR - ULH | 54% Loosely correlated | -1.77% | ||
| KNX - ULH | 53% Loosely correlated | -1.43% | ||
More | ||||