ASPS
Price
$0.61
Change
+$0.06 (+10.91%)
Updated
Dec 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
73 days until earnings call
OPAD
Price
$3.40
Change
-$0.25 (-6.85%)
Updated
Dec 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Ad is loading...

ASPS vs OPAD

Header iconASPS vs OPAD Comparison
Open Charts ASPS vs OPADBanner chart's image
Altisource Portfolio Solutions SA
Price$0.61
Change+$0.06 (+10.91%)
Volume$2.26K
CapitalizationN/A
Offerpad Solutions
Price$3.40
Change-$0.25 (-6.85%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
ASPS vs OPAD Comparison Chart
Loading...
ASPS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OPAD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ASPS vs. OPAD commentary
Dec 24, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASPS is a Hold and OPAD is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 24, 2024
Stock price -- (ASPS: $0.55 vs. OPAD: $3.65)
Brand notoriety: ASPS and OPAD are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ASPS: 416% vs. OPAD: 410%
Market capitalization -- ASPS: $51.55M vs. OPAD: $221.01M
ASPS [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $51.55M. OPAD’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $221.01M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ASPS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileOPAD’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ASPS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • OPAD’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, OPAD is a better buy in the long-term than ASPS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ASPS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OPAD’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ASPS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • OPAD’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ASPS is a better buy in the short-term than OPAD.

Price Growth

ASPS (@Real Estate Development) experienced а -25.80% price change this week, while OPAD (@Real Estate Development) price change was -8.52% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was -1.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.53%.

Reported Earning Dates

ASPS is expected to report earnings on Mar 06, 2025.

OPAD is expected to report earnings on Aug 02, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (-1.83% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OPAD($221M) has a higher market cap than ASPS($51.5M). OPAD has higher P/E ratio than ASPS: OPAD (38.02) vs ASPS (2.55). OPAD YTD gains are higher at: -64.390 vs. ASPS (-84.579). ASPS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -6.9M vs. OPAD (-97.47M). OPAD has more cash in the bank: 76M vs. ASPS (32.5M). ASPS has less debt than OPAD: ASPS (219M) vs OPAD (259M). OPAD has higher revenues than ASPS: OPAD (1.31B) vs ASPS (145M).
ASPSOPADASPS / OPAD
Capitalization51.5M221M23%
EBITDA-6.9M-97.47M7%
Gain YTD-84.579-64.390131%
P/E Ratio2.5538.027%
Revenue145M1.31B11%
Total Cash32.5M76M43%
Total Debt219M259M85%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ASPS: Fundamental Ratings
ASPS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
53
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
96
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ASPSOPAD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ASPS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OPAD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CIG1.890.05
+2.72%
Companhia Energetica De Minas Gerais-CEMIG
CDE5.880.11
+1.91%
Coeur Mining
TT377.110.21
+0.06%
Trane Technologies plc
LE13.07-0.01
-0.08%
Lands' End
ELTX4.88-0.19
-3.84%
Elicio Therapeutics

ASPS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ASPS and KW have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ASPS and KW's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ASPS
1D Price
Change %
ASPS100%
+8.05%
KW - ASPS
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.70%
HHH - ASPS
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.67%
OPAD - ASPS
21%
Poorly correlated
+6.73%
IRS - ASPS
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.13%
CWK - ASPS
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.08%
More

OPAD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OPAD has been loosely correlated with RDFN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OPAD jumps, then RDFN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OPAD
1D Price
Change %
OPAD100%
+6.73%
RDFN - OPAD
36%
Loosely correlated
+5.58%
MLP - OPAD
30%
Poorly correlated
+6.93%
EXPI - OPAD
29%
Poorly correlated
+10.43%
OPEN - OPAD
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.50%
MMI - OPAD
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.93%
More