It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ASRMF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGPAEF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ASRMF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GPAEF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
ASRMF (@Other Transportation) experienced а +5.44% price change this week, while GPAEF (@Other Transportation) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Transportation industry was -0.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.53%.
Other Transportation includes transportation services like providing airport ground transportation, airport management and equipment, shipping services, as well as businesses that operate bridges, expressways and other public services such as taxis and subways. Grupo Aero-pac, Corporacion America Airports S.A. and Matson, Inc. are some of the major companies operating in this space.
ASRMF | GPAEF | ASRMF / GPAEF | |
Capitalization | 8.54B | 8.11B | 105% |
EBITDA | 17.5B | 14.8B | 118% |
Gain YTD | -4.152 | 11.336 | -37% |
P/E Ratio | 13.14 | 13.91 | 94% |
Revenue | 26.2B | 23.1B | 113% |
Total Cash | 14.5B | 13.5B | 107% |
Total Debt | 13.1B | 27.9B | 47% |
ASRMF | GPAEF | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 87 | 48 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 41 Fair valued | 38 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 30 | 25 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 34 | 21 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 41 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 73 | 20 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 30 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GPAEF's Valuation (38) in the null industry is in the same range as ASRMF (41). This means that GPAEF’s stock grew similarly to ASRMF’s over the last 12 months.
GPAEF's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the null industry is in the same range as ASRMF (30). This means that GPAEF’s stock grew similarly to ASRMF’s over the last 12 months.
GPAEF's SMR Rating (21) in the null industry is in the same range as ASRMF (34). This means that GPAEF’s stock grew similarly to ASRMF’s over the last 12 months.
GPAEF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as ASRMF (59). This means that GPAEF’s stock grew similarly to ASRMF’s over the last 12 months.
GPAEF's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ASRMF (73). This means that GPAEF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ASRMF’s over the last 12 months.
ASRMF | GPAEF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago46% | 2 days ago38% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago64% | 2 days ago47% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago67% | 2 days ago56% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago41% | 2 days ago51% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago27% | 2 days ago44% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago27% | 2 days ago42% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago60% | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago35% | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago70% | 2 days ago54% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago24% | 2 days ago50% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
ALOYX | 19.41 | N/A | N/A |
Alger Mid Cap Focus Y | |||
MGGPX | 33.95 | -0.10 | -0.29% |
Morgan Stanley Inst Global Opp A | |||
HFSSX | 12.75 | -0.06 | -0.47% |
Hartford Schroders Intl Cntrrn Val SDR | |||
CRRRX | 15.63 | -0.23 | -1.45% |
Columbia Small Cap Value II Inst2 | |||
FNEEX | 64.11 | -6.32 | -8.97% |
American Funds New Economy 529-F-2 |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ASRMF has been loosely correlated with ASR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ASRMF jumps, then ASR could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ASRMF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ASRMF | 100% | +10.65% | ||
ASR - ASRMF | 37% Loosely correlated | -1.19% | ||
OMAB - ASRMF | 28% Poorly correlated | -0.32% | ||
PAC - ASRMF | 27% Poorly correlated | -1.16% | ||
GPAEF - ASRMF | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
CHRRF - ASRMF | 20% Poorly correlated | -5.16% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that GPAEF and PAC have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GPAEF and PAC's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GPAEF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
GPAEF | 100% | N/A | ||
PAC - GPAEF | 22% Poorly correlated | -1.16% | ||
ASR - GPAEF | 21% Poorly correlated | -1.19% | ||
OMAB - GPAEF | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.32% | ||
ASRMF - GPAEF | 20% Poorly correlated | +10.65% | ||
JTTRY - GPAEF | 6% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |