ASST
Price
$2.43
Change
-$0.32 (-11.64%)
Updated
Sep 26, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.55B
BBUZ
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
28.49M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ASST vs BBUZ

Header iconASST vs BBUZ Comparison
Open Charts ASST vs BBUZBanner chart's image
Strive
Price$2.43
Change-$0.32 (-11.64%)
Volume$36.01K
Capitalization1.55B
Bebuzee
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100K
Capitalization28.49M
ASST vs BBUZ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ASST
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BBUZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ASST vs. BBUZ commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASST is a Hold and BBUZ is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (ASST: $2.75 vs. BBUZ: $0.04)
Brand notoriety: ASST and BBUZ are both not notable
ASST represents the Investment Managers, while BBUZ is part of the Internet Software/Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ASST: 125% vs. BBUZ: 139%
Market capitalization -- ASST: $1.55B vs. BBUZ: $28.49M
ASST [@Investment Managers] is valued at $1.55B. BBUZ’s [@Internet Software/Services] market capitalization is $28.49M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $179.08B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Internet Software/Services] industry ranges from $2.98T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.38B. The average market capitalization across the [@Internet Software/Services] industry is $83.55B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ASST’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileBBUZ’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ASST’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • BBUZ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BBUZ is a better buy in the long-term than ASST.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ASST’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BBUZ’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ASST’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • BBUZ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BBUZ is a better buy in the short-term than ASST.

Price Growth

ASST (@Investment Managers) experienced а -28.01% price change this week, while BBUZ (@Internet Software/Services) price change was -4.32% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.01%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Software/Services industry was -1.82%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +152.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was +176.29%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-2.06% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

@Internet Software/Services (-1.82% weekly)

Companies in this industry typically license software on a subscription basis and it is centrally hosted. Such products usually go by the names web-based software, on-demand software and hosted software. Cloud computing has emerged as a major force in this space, making it possible to save files to a remote database (without requiring them to be saved on local storage device); as long as a device has access to the web, it can access the data and the software programs to run it. This has in many cases facilitated cost efficiency, speed and security of data for businesses and consumers. Alphabet Inc., Facebook, Inc. and Yahoo! Inc. are some well-known names in the internet software/services industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ASST($1.55B) has a higher market cap than BBUZ($28.5M). ASST YTD gains are higher at: 460.652 vs. BBUZ (21.001).
ASSTBBUZASST / BBUZ
Capitalization1.55B28.5M5,439%
EBITDA-7.58MN/A-
Gain YTD460.65221.0012,194%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue760KN/A-
Total Cash2.52MN/A-
Total Debt9.14KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BBUZ: Fundamental Ratings
BBUZ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
24
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
64
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ASSTBBUZ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ASST
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BBUZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CPHRF11.710.15
+1.30%
Cipher Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
HELNF137.99N/A
N/A
HELVETIA PATRIA HLDG.
HSTI1.40N/A
N/A
High Sierra Technologies Inc.
MCSHF2.44N/A
N/A
Metcash Ltd.
RGBP0.01N/A
-7.14%
Regen Biopharma, Inc.

BBUZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BBUZ and LCFY have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BBUZ and LCFY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BBUZ
1D Price
Change %
BBUZ100%
-4.32%
LCFY - BBUZ
8%
Poorly correlated
+3.10%
PODC - BBUZ
-3%
Poorly correlated
+4.02%
SABOF - BBUZ
-4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ONFO - BBUZ
-4%
Poorly correlated
-1.69%
ASST - BBUZ
-6%
Poorly correlated
-8.64%
More