ASST
Price
$2.43
Change
-$0.32 (-11.64%)
Updated
Sep 26, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.55B
SABOF
Price
$0.31
Change
+$0.02 (+6.90%)
Updated
Sep 19 closing price
Capitalization
16.2M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ASST vs SABOF

Header iconASST vs SABOF Comparison
Open Charts ASST vs SABOFBanner chart's image
Strive
Price$2.43
Change-$0.32 (-11.64%)
Volume$36.01K
Capitalization1.55B
Sabio Holdings
Price$0.31
Change+$0.02 (+6.90%)
Volume$5K
Capitalization16.2M
ASST vs SABOF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ASST
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SABOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ASST vs. SABOF commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASST is a Hold and SABOF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (ASST: $2.75 vs. SABOF: $0.31)
Brand notoriety: ASST and SABOF are both not notable
ASST represents the Investment Managers, while SABOF is part of the Advertising/Marketing Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ASST: 125% vs. SABOF: 55%
Market capitalization -- ASST: $1.55B vs. SABOF: $16.2M
ASST [@Investment Managers] is valued at $1.55B. SABOF’s [@Advertising/Marketing Services] market capitalization is $16.2M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $179.08B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Advertising/Marketing Services] industry ranges from $216.45B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.38B. The average market capitalization across the [@Advertising/Marketing Services] industry is $4.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ASST’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSABOF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ASST’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SABOF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SABOF is a better buy in the long-term than ASST.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ASST’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SABOF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ASST’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • SABOF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SABOF is a better buy in the short-term than ASST.

Price Growth

ASST (@Investment Managers) experienced а -28.01% price change this week, while SABOF (@Advertising/Marketing Services) price change was +6.93% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.01%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Advertising/Marketing Services industry was -0.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +36.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +153.77%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-2.06% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

@Advertising/Marketing Services (-0.37% weekly)

Making a brand known to people, garnering more clients/consumers for its product and solidifying the brand’s position in an industry – all of these are essential to a company’s growth, and that’s where marketing/advertising come in as one of the key catalysts. Advertising industry is a global multibillion-dollar business of public relations and marketing companies, media services and advertising agencies – entities that help to connect manufacturers/producers with customers. Digital media has played a big role in the growth of global advertising, and agencies invest substantially to integrate advanced technologies into their business operations. According to some estimates, the U.S. advertising industry is expected to generate revenue of $52.6 billion by 2023, up from almost $40 billion in 2015 . Omnicom Group Inc., Trade Desk, Inc. and Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. are some of the major U.S. companies in the industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ASST($1.55B) has a higher market cap than SABOF($16.2M). ASST YTD gains are higher at: 460.652 vs. SABOF (-1.587). SABOF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.46M vs. ASST (-7.58M). ASST has more cash in the bank: 2.52M vs. SABOF (2.18M). ASST has less debt than SABOF: ASST (9.14K) vs SABOF (10.8M). SABOF has higher revenues than ASST: SABOF (54.6M) vs ASST (760K).
ASSTSABOFASST / SABOF
Capitalization1.55B16.2M9,568%
EBITDA-7.58M1.46M-519%
Gain YTD460.652-1.587-29,021%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue760K54.6M1%
Total Cash2.52M2.18M116%
Total Debt9.14K10.8M0%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ASSTSABOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ASST
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SABOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RYECX200.77N/A
N/A
Rydex Energy C
NMGCX18.41N/A
N/A
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth C
PCGRX25.12N/A
N/A
Victory Pioneer Mid Cap Value A
PQICX13.83N/A
N/A
PIMCO Dividend and Income C
GQLIX35.64N/A
N/A
GMO Quality I

SABOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SABOF and LCFY have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SABOF and LCFY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SABOF
1D Price
Change %
SABOF100%
N/A
LCFY - SABOF
7%
Poorly correlated
+3.10%
STBXF - SABOF
7%
Poorly correlated
-17.81%
GETY - SABOF
7%
Poorly correlated
-1.01%
ASST - SABOF
4%
Poorly correlated
-8.64%
PODC - SABOF
-1%
Poorly correlated
+4.02%
More