Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ASTFX vs LSDCX
ASTFX vs LSDCX Comparison
Open Charts ASTFX vs LSDCX
American Funds Shrt-Term Tx-Exmpt Bd F2
Price$10.14
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.09B
Lord Abbett Short Duration Tax Free C
Price$15.26
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.67B
ASTFX vs LSDCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ASTFX vs. LSDCX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASTFX is a Hold and LSDCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ASTFX has more cash in the bank: 2.09B vs. LSDCX (1.67B). ASTFX pays higher dividends than LSDCX: ASTFX (2.82) vs LSDCX (2.21). ASTFX was incepted earlier than LSDCX: ASTFX (16 years) vs LSDCX (17 years). LSDCX (1.27) is less costly to investors than ASTFX (0.32). LSDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. ASTFX (42.00). ASTFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSDCX: ASTFX (250) vs LSDCX (1000). LSDCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.65 vs. ASTFX (1.35). LSDCX return over 5 years is better than : 2.83 vs. ASTFX (-1.75).
| ASTFX | LSDCX | ASTFX / LSDCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.26 | 25% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 1.27 | 25% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.115 | 2.689 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.09B | 1.67B | 125% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.82 | 2.21 | 128% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.35 | 2.65 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.73 | 8.12 | 46% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.75 | 2.83 | -62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 1.48 | 5.31 | 28% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers