Advertisement
ASXFF vs ASXFY
To understand the difference between ASX Ltd (ASXFF) vs. ASX Ltd - ADR (ASXFY) it is enough to know the definitions of ADR
ADR - American depositary receipt (ADR) is a certificate issued by a U.S. depositary bank representing a specified number of shares (often 1 share) of a foreign company's stock. ADRs are denominated in U.S. dollars and trade on U.S. stock markets and OTC depending on the ADRs classification.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ASXFF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileASXFY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- ASXFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- ASXFY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ASXFF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ASXFY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ASXFF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
- ASXFY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
ASXFF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while ASXFY (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -6.70% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +3.99%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.68%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Banks/Brokers (+3.99% weekly)These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
| ASXFF | ASXFY | ASXFF / ASXFY | |
| Capitalization | 9.5B | 8.05B | 118% |
| EBITDA | 796M | 660M | 121% |
| Gain YTD | 14.504 | 7.129 | 203% |
| P/E Ratio | 26.53 | 36.50 | 73% |
| Revenue | 1.04B | 1.04B | 100% |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | N/A | - |
ASXFF | ASXFY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 47 | 66 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 92 Overvalued | 90 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 42 | 42 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | 51 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ASXFY's Valuation (90) in the null industry is in the same range as ASXFF (92). This means that ASXFY’s stock grew similarly to ASXFF’s over the last 12 months.
ASXFY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as ASXFF (100). This means that ASXFY’s stock grew similarly to ASXFF’s over the last 12 months.
ASXFY's SMR Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as ASXFF (42). This means that ASXFY’s stock grew similarly to ASXFF’s over the last 12 months.
ASXFY's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as ASXFF (51). This means that ASXFY’s stock grew similarly to ASXFF’s over the last 12 months.
ASXFF's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as ASXFY (51). This means that ASXFF’s stock grew similarly to ASXFY’s over the last 12 months.
| ASXFF | ASXFY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 34% | 1 day ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 57% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 43% | 1 day ago 64% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 40% | 1 day ago 56% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 35% | 1 day ago 54% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 59% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 58% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 30% | 1 day ago 60% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MEXX | 18.07 | 0.88 | +5.12% |
| Direxion Dly MSCI Mexico Bull 3X ShsETF | |||
| BSMC | 31.31 | 0.12 | +0.39% |
| Brandes U.S. Small-Mid Cap Value ETF | |||
| NUMG | 47.53 | -0.75 | -1.55% |
| Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF | |||
| FAS | 156.89 | -2.88 | -1.80% |
| Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X ETF | |||
| EUAD | 42.05 | -0.96 | -2.23% |
| Select STOXX Europe Aerospace & Defense ETF | |||
ASXFF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that ASXFF and ASXFY have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ASXFF and ASXFY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ASXFF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASXFF | 100% | N/A | ||
| ASXFY - ASXFF | 28% Poorly correlated | -8.46% | ||
| MCQEF - ASXFF | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CLSK - ASXFF | 6% Poorly correlated | -2.55% | ||
| PIPR - ASXFF | 5% Poorly correlated | -0.49% | ||
| BBKCF - ASXFF | 2% Poorly correlated | -5.30% | ||
More | ||||
ASXFY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ASXFY has been loosely correlated with MQBKY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ASXFY jumps, then MQBKY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ASXFY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASXFY | 100% | -8.46% | ||
| MQBKY - ASXFY | 46% Loosely correlated | -0.11% | ||
| CMSQY - ASXFY | 33% Poorly correlated | -0.90% | ||
| EVR - ASXFY | 33% Poorly correlated | -0.62% | ||
| SF - ASXFY | 32% Poorly correlated | -1.37% | ||
| PIPR - ASXFY | 31% Poorly correlated | -0.49% | ||
More | ||||