ASXFY
Price
$45.04
Change
+$0.53 (+1.19%)
Updated
Apr 24 closing price
Capitalization
8.05B
SF
Price
$85.77
Change
+$0.03 (+0.03%)
Updated
Apr 25, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
7.95B
89 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

ASXFY vs SF

Header iconASXFY vs SF Comparison
Open Charts ASXFY vs SFBanner chart's image
ASX
Price$45.04
Change+$0.53 (+1.19%)
Volume$10.49K
Capitalization8.05B
Stifel Financial
Price$85.77
Change+$0.03 (+0.03%)
Volume$5.42K
Capitalization7.95B
ASXFY vs SF Comparison Chart
Loading...
ASXFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ASXFY vs. SF commentary
Apr 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASXFY is a StrongBuy and SF is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 25, 2025
Stock price -- (ASXFY: $45.04 vs. SF: $85.74)
Brand notoriety: ASXFY and SF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ASXFY: 68% vs. SF: 129%
Market capitalization -- ASXFY: $8.05B vs. SF: $7.95B
ASXFY [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $8.05B. SF’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $7.95B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $12.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ASXFY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ASXFY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, ASXFY is a better buy in the long-term than SF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ASXFY’s TA Score shows that 8 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ASXFY’s TA Score: 8 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ASXFY is a better buy in the short-term than SF.

Price Growth

ASXFY (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +4.11% price change this week, while SF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +0.72% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +5.87%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was +136.47%.

Reported Earning Dates

ASXFY is expected to report earnings on Feb 13, 2025.

SF is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+5.87% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ASXFY($8.05B) and SF($7.95B) have the same market capitalization . ASXFY has higher P/E ratio than SF: ASXFY (36.50) vs SF (18.06). ASXFY YTD gains are higher at: 15.571 vs. SF (-18.823). SF has higher revenues than ASXFY: SF (4.29B) vs ASXFY (1.04B).
ASXFYSFASXFY / SF
Capitalization8.05B7.95B101%
EBITDA660MN/A-
Gain YTD15.571-18.823-83%
P/E Ratio36.5018.06202%
Revenue1.04B4.29B24%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A1.18B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ASXFY vs SF: Fundamental Ratings
ASXFY
SF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7510
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
96
Overvalued
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7925
SMR RATING
1..100
148
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4364
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3860
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SF's Valuation (87) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as ASXFY (96) in the null industry. This means that SF’s stock grew similarly to ASXFY’s over the last 12 months.

SF's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ASXFY (79) in the null industry. This means that SF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ASXFY’s over the last 12 months.

SF's SMR Rating (8) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as ASXFY (14) in the null industry. This means that SF’s stock grew similarly to ASXFY’s over the last 12 months.

ASXFY's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as SF (64) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that ASXFY’s stock grew similarly to SF’s over the last 12 months.

ASXFY's P/E Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as SF (60) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that ASXFY’s stock grew similarly to SF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ASXFYSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ASXFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
REMX38.761.53
+4.11%
VanEck Rare Earth & Strat Mtls ETF
SIXS44.990.44
+0.99%
ETC 6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF
QYLD16.180.13
+0.81%
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
APCB29.370.16
+0.55%
ActivePassive Core Bond ETF
MCH22.740.03
+0.12%
Matthews China Active ETF

ASXFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ASXFY has been loosely correlated with MQBKY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ASXFY jumps, then MQBKY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ASXFY
1D Price
Change %
ASXFY100%
+1.19%
MQBKY - ASXFY
46%
Loosely correlated
+3.79%
CMSQY - ASXFY
33%
Poorly correlated
-0.24%
EVR - ASXFY
33%
Poorly correlated
+5.86%
SF - ASXFY
32%
Poorly correlated
+3.55%
PIPR - ASXFY
31%
Poorly correlated
+3.30%
More