ASXFY vs SF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASXFY is a Hold and SF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ASXFY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- ASXFY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ASXFY’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ASXFY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- SF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
ASXFY (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -1.10% price change this week, while SF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -1.50% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -3.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.24%.
Reported Earning Dates
ASXFY is expected to report earnings on Feb 13, 2025.
SF is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Banks/Brokers (-3.11% weekly)These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
| ASXFY | SF | ASXFY / SF | |
| Capitalization | 8.05B | 7.95B | 101% |
| EBITDA | 660M | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.371 | -1.989 | -220% |
| P/E Ratio | 36.50 | 18.06 | 202% |
| Revenue | 1.04B | 4.29B | 24% |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 1.18B | - |
ASXFY | SF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 22 | 66 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 96 Overvalued | 87 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 10 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 33 | 10 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | 58 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 13 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SF's Valuation (87) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as ASXFY (96) in the null industry. This means that SF’s stock grew similarly to ASXFY’s over the last 12 months.
SF's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is significantly better than the same rating for ASXFY (100) in the null industry. This means that SF’s stock grew significantly faster than ASXFY’s over the last 12 months.
SF's SMR Rating (10) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as ASXFY (33) in the null industry. This means that SF’s stock grew similarly to ASXFY’s over the last 12 months.
ASXFY's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as SF (50) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that ASXFY’s stock grew similarly to SF’s over the last 12 months.
ASXFY's P/E Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as SF (58) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that ASXFY’s stock grew similarly to SF’s over the last 12 months.
| ASXFY | SF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 50% | 1 day ago 57% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 49% | 1 day ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 54% | 1 day ago 61% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 53% | 1 day ago 62% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 59% | 15 days ago 69% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 12 days ago 64% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 51% | 1 day ago 62% |
ASXFY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ASXFY has been loosely correlated with MQBKY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ASXFY jumps, then MQBKY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ASXFY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASXFY | 100% | -1.64% | ||
| MQBKY - ASXFY | 46% Loosely correlated | -0.73% | ||
| CMSQY - ASXFY | 33% Poorly correlated | +0.27% | ||
| EVR - ASXFY | 33% Poorly correlated | -3.52% | ||
| SF - ASXFY | 32% Poorly correlated | -2.09% | ||
| PIPR - ASXFY | 31% Poorly correlated | -2.25% | ||
More | ||||