ATEAY
Price
$6.12
Change
-$0.18 (-2.86%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
CXGEF
Price
$0.22
Change
-$0.05 (-18.52%)
Updated
Oct 24 closing price
Ad is loading...

ATEAY vs CXGEF

Header iconATEAY vs CXGEF Comparison
Open Charts ATEAY vs CXGEFBanner chart's image
Atea ASA
Price$6.12
Change-$0.18 (-2.86%)
Volume$200
CapitalizationN/A
Computer & Technologies Holdings
Price$0.22
Change-$0.05 (-18.52%)
Volume$200
CapitalizationN/A
ATEAY vs CXGEF Comparison Chart
Loading...
ATEAY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ATEAY vs. CXGEF commentary
Dec 24, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ATEAY is a Hold and CXGEF is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 24, 2024
Stock price -- (ATEAY: $6.12 vs. CXGEF: $0.22)
Brand notoriety: ATEAY and CXGEF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Information Technology Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ATEAY: 19% vs. CXGEF: 74%
Market capitalization -- ATEAY: $1.36B vs. CXGEF: $48.41M
ATEAY [@Information Technology Services] is valued at $1.36B. CXGEF’s [@Information Technology Services] market capitalization is $48.41M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Information Technology Services] industry ranges from $224.4B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Information Technology Services] industry is $9.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ATEAY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCXGEF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ATEAY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CXGEF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ATEAY is a better buy in the long-term than CXGEF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ATEAY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • ATEAY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

ATEAY (@Information Technology Services) experienced а -2.86% price change this week, while CXGEF (@Information Technology Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Information Technology Services industry was +0.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.61%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Information Technology Services (+0.16% weekly)

The industry, whose total market cap runs into trillions, makes hardware/software that allows data to be stored, retrieved, transmitted, and manipulated on computers. With the ever-increasing relevance of data, the information technology (IT) industry has gained momentous growth over the years, and continues to thrive on innovation. Some of the behemoths in the industry are International Business Machines Corporation, Accenture, and VMware, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ATEAY($1.36B) has a higher market cap than CXGEF($48.4M). ATEAY has higher P/E ratio than CXGEF: ATEAY (20.39) vs CXGEF (12.65). ATEAY YTD gains are higher at: 30.523 vs. CXGEF (-10.931).
ATEAYCXGEFATEAY / CXGEF
Capitalization1.36B48.4M2,802%
EBITDA1.93BN/A-
Gain YTD30.523-10.931-279%
P/E Ratio20.3912.65161%
Revenue33.4BN/A-
Total Cash1.03BN/A-
Total Debt2.74BN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ATEAYCXGEF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
30%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
23%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
11%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
8%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
31%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ATEAY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
XLE83.930.49
+0.59%
The Energy Select Sector SPDR® ETF
IGBH24.300.07
+0.29%
iShares Interest Rate Hdg L/T Corp BdETF
EDOG20.710.01
+0.03%
ALPS Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs ETF
LIT42.15-0.01
-0.02%
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
RSPS30.17-0.10
-0.34%
Invesco S&P 500® Eql Wt Cnsm Stapl ETF

ATEAY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ATEAY and CXGEF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ATEAY and CXGEF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ATEAY
1D Price
Change %
ATEAY100%
N/A
CXGEF - ATEAY
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ITFRF - ATEAY
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NYAX - ATEAY
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.10%
KD - ATEAY
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.29%
NONEF - ATEAY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CXGEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CXGEF and CTSDF have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CXGEF and CTSDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CXGEF
1D Price
Change %
CXGEF100%
N/A
CTSDF - CXGEF
33%
Poorly correlated
-3.72%
ATEAY - CXGEF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IBM - CXGEF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.64%
ITFRF - CXGEF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BNXAF - CXGEF
12%
Poorly correlated
-2.75%
More