Ad is loading...
ATECX vs RNPFX
ATECX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts ATECX vs RNPFX
AB Sustainable Global Thematic C
Price$91.90
Change-$4.46 (-4.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.54B
American Funds New Perspective R5
Price$59.13
Change-$2.45 (-3.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets139.04B
ATECX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ATECX vs. RNPFX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ATECX is a Buy and RNPFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 139B vs. ATECX (1.54B). RNPFX pays higher dividends than ATECX: RNPFX (0.84) vs ATECX (0.00). ATECX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: ATECX (32 years) vs RNPFX (23 years). ATECX (1.78) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.46). ATECX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. RNPFX (24.00). RNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ATECX: RNPFX (250) vs ATECX (2500). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.65 vs. ATECX (-14.29). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 70.60 vs. ATECX (20.73).
| ATECX | RNPFX | ATECX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.78 | 0.46 | 387% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.78 | 0.46 | 387% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.406 | -0.741 | 864% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.54B | 139B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.84 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.29 | 2.65 | -538% |
| Returns for 3 years | -16.69 | 3.11 | -536% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.73 | 70.60 | 29% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.49 | 64.56 | 46% |