Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ATECX vs RNPFX
ATECX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts ATECX vs RNPFX
AB Sustainable Global Thematic C
Price$104.12
Change-$1.74 (-1.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.62B
American Funds New Perspective R5
Price$67.50
Change-$0.81 (-1.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets152.4B
ATECX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ATECX vs. RNPFX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ATECX is a Buy and RNPFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 152B vs. ATECX (1.62B). RNPFX pays higher dividends than ATECX: RNPFX (0.77) vs ATECX (0.00). ATECX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: ATECX (32 years) vs RNPFX (23 years). ATECX (1.78) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.46). ATECX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. RNPFX (24.00). RNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ATECX: RNPFX (250) vs ATECX (2500). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.22 vs. ATECX (-6.65). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 49.60 vs. ATECX (4.58).
| ATECX | RNPFX | ATECX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.78 | 0.46 | 387% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.78 | 0.46 | 387% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.856 | 8.801 | 44% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.62B | 152B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.77 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.65 | 9.22 | -72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.75 | 43.84 | 31% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.58 | 49.60 | 9% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.73 | 78.80 | 52% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement