Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ATECX vs RNPFX
ATECX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts ATECX vs RNPFX
AB Sustainable Global Thematic C
Price$109.47
Change+$0.20 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.62B
American Funds New Perspective R5
Price$71.95
Change+$0.34 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.47B
ATECX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ATECX vs. RNPFX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ATECX is a Hold and RNPFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. ATECX (1.62B). RNPFX pays higher dividends than ATECX: RNPFX (0.72) vs ATECX (0.00). ATECX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: ATECX (32 years) vs RNPFX (23 years). ATECX (1.78) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.46). ATECX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. RNPFX (24.00). RNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ATECX: RNPFX (250) vs ATECX (2500). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.49 vs. ATECX (-6.53). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 36.59 vs. ATECX (-5.92).
| ATECX | RNPFX | ATECX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.78 | 0.46 | 387% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.78 | 0.46 | 387% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.201 | 15.974 | 45% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.62B | 158B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.72 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.53 | 15.49 | -42% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.91 | 49.63 | 28% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.92 | 36.59 | -16% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.12 | 100.52 | 60% |