It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ATER’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMBC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ATER’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MBC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
ATER (@Home Furnishings) experienced а -2.12% price change this week, while MBC (@Home Furnishings) price change was -10.27% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Home Furnishings industry was -3.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.01%.
MBC is expected to report earnings on May 13, 2025.
The home furnishings industry includes companies that sell items like furniture, appliances, rugs, cooking utensils, and art objects. According to Mordor Intelligence, the U.S. home decor market is estimated to grow at CAGR 7.5% between 2019 and 2024. The market is being increasingly penetrated by e-commerce and m-commerce, while growing urbanization, and, consumers’ rising interest towards home decor are driving demand for the industry. Mohawk Industries, Inc., La-Z-Boy Incorporated, Leggett & Platt, Incorporated are some of the prominent companies in this space. Being usually discretionary for consumers, demand for furnishings could be affected by macroeconomic cycles.
ATER | MBC | ATER / MBC | |
Capitalization | 21.2M | 2.38B | 1% |
EBITDA | -69.42M | 368M | -19% |
Gain YTD | -16.192 | -9.719 | 167% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | 13.13 | - |
Revenue | 143M | 2.73B | 5% |
Total Cash | 20M | 149M | 13% |
Total Debt | 12.1M | 770M | 2% |
ATER | MBC | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago84% | 1 day ago78% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago86% | 1 day ago90% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago90% | 1 day ago68% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago89% | 1 day ago67% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago89% | 1 day ago73% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago88% | 1 day ago71% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago86% | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago90% | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago90% | 1 day ago81% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago88% | 1 day ago68% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that ATER and LZB have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ATER and LZB's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ATER | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ATER | 100% | -2.36% | ||
LZB - ATER | 26% Poorly correlated | -3.85% | ||
MLKN - ATER | 25% Poorly correlated | -2.21% | ||
PATK - ATER | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.60% | ||
MBC - ATER | 23% Poorly correlated | -5.72% | ||
AMWD - ATER | 23% Poorly correlated | -2.26% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MBC has been loosely correlated with SGI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MBC jumps, then SGI could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MBC | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
MBC | 100% | -5.72% | ||
SGI - MBC | 52% Loosely correlated | -2.14% | ||
MHK - MBC | 52% Loosely correlated | -1.10% | ||
AMWD - MBC | 49% Loosely correlated | -2.26% | ||
ETD - MBC | 46% Loosely correlated | -2.21% | ||
PATK - MBC | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.60% | ||
More |