ATGFF vs MPIR
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ATGFF is a Hold and MPIR is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ATGFF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMPIR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- ATGFF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- MPIR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Price Growth
ATGFF (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а +5.03% price change this week, while MPIR (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was -7.69% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was +1.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.97%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Oil & Gas Pipelines (+1.61% weekly)Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.
| ATGFF | MPIR | ATGFF / MPIR | |
| Capitalization | 5.53B | 97.9M | 5,651% |
| EBITDA | 1.75B | -7.66M | -22,860% |
| Gain YTD | 17.692 | -1.639 | -1,079% |
| P/E Ratio | 12.59 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 13.6B | 6.56M | 207,285% |
| Total Cash | 64M | 1.14M | 5,614% |
| Total Debt | 8.64B | 56.4M | 15,324% |
ATGFF | MPIR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 21 | 26 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 54 Fair valued | 2 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 11 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 78 | 99 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | 88 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 12 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MPIR's Valuation (2) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ATGFF (54). This means that MPIR’s stock grew somewhat faster than ATGFF’s over the last 12 months.
ATGFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MPIR (100). This means that ATGFF’s stock grew significantly faster than MPIR’s over the last 12 months.
ATGFF's SMR Rating (78) in the null industry is in the same range as MPIR (99). This means that ATGFF’s stock grew similarly to MPIR’s over the last 12 months.
ATGFF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MPIR (88). This means that ATGFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MPIR’s over the last 12 months.
ATGFF's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MPIR (100). This means that ATGFF’s stock grew significantly faster than MPIR’s over the last 12 months.
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
ATGFF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that ATGFF and WES have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ATGFF and WES's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ATGFF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATGFF | 100% | +1.52% | ||
| WES - ATGFF | 31% Poorly correlated | +2.12% | ||
| KEYUF - ATGFF | 26% Poorly correlated | +4.56% | ||
| EPD - ATGFF | 24% Poorly correlated | +2.35% | ||
| ET - ATGFF | 23% Poorly correlated | +2.64% | ||
| DHT - ATGFF | 23% Poorly correlated | +7.72% | ||
More | ||||
MPIR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MPIR and EXMRF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MPIR and EXMRF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MPIR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MPIR | 100% | -7.69% | ||
| EXMRF - MPIR | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ATGFF - MPIR | 15% Poorly correlated | +1.52% | ||
| TRMD - MPIR | 2% Poorly correlated | +4.07% | ||
| BROG - MPIR | 1% Poorly correlated | +3.45% | ||
| AVACF - MPIR | 1% Poorly correlated | +6.01% | ||
More | ||||