Ad is loading...
ATGYX vs FSMDX
ATGYX vs FSMDX Comparison
Open Charts ATGYX vs FSMDX
Cantor Fitzgerald Equity Opp Inst
Price$39.25
Change-$0.46 (-1.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69.74M
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$31.66
Change-$0.48 (-1.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets38.34B
ATGYX vs FSMDX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ATGYX vs. FSMDX commentary
Mar 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ATGYX is a Hold and FSMDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 38.3B vs. ATGYX (69.7M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than ATGYX: FSMDX (1.14) vs ATGYX (0.44). ATGYX was incepted earlier than FSMDX: ATGYX (29 years) vs FSMDX (14 years). ATGYX (1.26) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). ATGYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 107.00 vs. FSMDX (8.00). ATGYX (0) and FSMDX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.60 vs. ATGYX (-19.47). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 86.07 vs. ATGYX (-9.70).
| ATGYX | FSMDX | ATGYX / FSMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.03 | 5,040% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.03 | 5,040% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.532 | -4.797 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 69.7M | 38.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 1.14 | 39% |
| Returns for 1 year | -19.47 | 2.60 | -748% |
| Returns for 3 years | -15.51 | 19.02 | -82% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.70 | 86.07 | -11% |
| Returns for 10 years | -18.97 | 97.95 | -19% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...