ATOXF
Price
$0.12
Change
+$0.01 (+9.09%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
13.08M
CGMLF
Price
$1.11
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
445.61M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ATOXF vs CGMLF

Header iconATOXF vs CGMLF Comparison
Open Charts ATOXF vs CGMLFBanner chart's image
QUANTUM CRITICAL METALS
Price$0.12
Change+$0.01 (+9.09%)
Volume$109.04K
Capitalization13.08M
Chalice Mining
Price$1.11
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$8K
Capitalization445.61M
ATOXF vs CGMLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ATOXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CGMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ATOXF vs. CGMLF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ATOXF is a StrongBuy and CGMLF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (ATOXF: $0.12 vs. CGMLF: $1.11)
Brand notoriety: ATOXF and CGMLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ATOXF: 70% vs. CGMLF: 226%
Market capitalization -- ATOXF: $13.08M vs. CGMLF: $445.61M
ATOXF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $13.08M. CGMLF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $445.61M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ATOXF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCGMLF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ATOXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CGMLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both ATOXF and CGMLF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ATOXF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CGMLF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ATOXF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • CGMLF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CGMLF is a better buy in the short-term than ATOXF.

Price Growth

ATOXF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +68.86% price change this week, while CGMLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -4.38% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +4.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +121.89%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+4.20% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGMLF($446M) has a higher market cap than ATOXF($13.1M). ATOXF YTD gains are higher at: 243.605 vs. CGMLF (75.433). ATOXF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -453.16K vs. CGMLF (-26.99M).
ATOXFCGMLFATOXF / CGMLF
Capitalization13.1M446M3%
EBITDA-453.16K-26.99M2%
Gain YTD243.60575.433323%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue0N/A-
Total Cash20.4KN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ATOXF vs CGMLF: Fundamental Ratings
ATOXF
CGMLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6430
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
99
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9294
SMR RATING
1..100
9695
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3538
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5047

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ATOXF's Valuation (88) in the null industry is in the same range as CGMLF (99). This means that ATOXF’s stock grew similarly to CGMLF’s over the last 12 months.

ATOXF's Profit vs Risk Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as CGMLF (94). This means that ATOXF’s stock grew similarly to CGMLF’s over the last 12 months.

CGMLF's SMR Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as ATOXF (96). This means that CGMLF’s stock grew similarly to ATOXF’s over the last 12 months.

ATOXF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as CGMLF (38). This means that ATOXF’s stock grew similarly to CGMLF’s over the last 12 months.

ATOXF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CGMLF (100). This means that ATOXF’s stock grew similarly to CGMLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ATOXFCGMLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
87%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ATOXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CGMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NEM76.171.29
+1.72%
Newmont Corp
CWH17.910.27
+1.53%
Camping World Holdings
IZM2.500.03
+1.21%
ICZOOM Group
MC70.68-1.05
-1.46%
Moelis & Company
DBVT8.97-0.25
-2.75%
DBV Technologies S.A

ATOXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ATOXF and JZRIF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ATOXF and JZRIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ATOXF
1D Price
Change %
ATOXF100%
+8.44%
JZRIF - ATOXF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NAK - ATOXF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.10%
SRCGF - ATOXF
22%
Poorly correlated
-5.40%
CGMLF - ATOXF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.36%
ATBHF - ATOXF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CGMLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CGMLF and NAK have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CGMLF and NAK's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CGMLF
1D Price
Change %
CGMLF100%
+0.36%
NAK - CGMLF
31%
Poorly correlated
-1.10%
CVVUF - CGMLF
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.37%
PMETF - CGMLF
20%
Poorly correlated
+3.87%
GLNCY - CGMLF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.65%
ATOXF - CGMLF
20%
Poorly correlated
+8.44%
More