ATOXF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
2.84M
NAK
Price
$0.63
Change
-$0.01 (-1.56%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
169.37M
68 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

ATOXF vs NAK

Header iconATOXF vs NAK Comparison
Open Charts ATOXF vs NAKBanner chart's image
Durango Resources
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$406.3K
Capitalization2.84M
Northern Dynasty Minerals
Price$0.63
Change-$0.01 (-1.56%)
Volume$3.4M
Capitalization169.37M
ATOXF vs NAK Comparison Chart
Loading...
ATOXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NAK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ATOXF vs. NAK commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ATOXF is a Hold and NAK is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (ATOXF: $0.04 vs. NAK: $0.63)
Brand notoriety: ATOXF and NAK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ATOXF: 331% vs. NAK: 112%
Market capitalization -- ATOXF: $2.84M vs. NAK: $169.37M
ATOXF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $2.84M. NAK’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $169.37M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ATOXF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNAK’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ATOXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NAK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, NAK is a better buy in the long-term than ATOXF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ATOXF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NAK’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ATOXF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NAK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NAK is a better buy in the short-term than ATOXF.

Price Growth

ATOXF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +8.38% price change this week, while NAK (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +3.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.96%.

Reported Earning Dates

NAK is expected to report earnings on May 14, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.34% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAK($169M) has a higher market cap than ATOXF($2.84M). ATOXF YTD gains are higher at: 9.012 vs. NAK (8.340). ATOXF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -339.53K vs. NAK (-23.46M). NAK has more cash in the bank: 1.38M vs. ATOXF (683K). ATOXF has less debt than NAK: ATOXF (9.64K) vs NAK (515K). ATOXF (0) and NAK (0) have equivalent revenues.
ATOXFNAKATOXF / NAK
Capitalization2.84M169M2%
EBITDA-339.53K-23.46M1%
Gain YTD9.0128.340108%
P/E Ratio22.83N/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash683K1.38M49%
Total Debt9.64K515K2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ATOXF vs NAK: Fundamental Ratings
ATOXF
NAK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5077
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
55
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10083
SMR RATING
1..100
9594
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3535
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NAK's Valuation (55) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is in the same range as ATOXF (84) in the null industry. This means that NAK’s stock grew similarly to ATOXF’s over the last 12 months.

NAK's Profit vs Risk Rating (83) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is in the same range as ATOXF (100) in the null industry. This means that NAK’s stock grew similarly to ATOXF’s over the last 12 months.

NAK's SMR Rating (94) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is in the same range as ATOXF (95) in the null industry. This means that NAK’s stock grew similarly to ATOXF’s over the last 12 months.

NAK's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is in the same range as ATOXF (35) in the null industry. This means that NAK’s stock grew similarly to ATOXF’s over the last 12 months.

NAK's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is in the same range as ATOXF (100) in the null industry. This means that NAK’s stock grew similarly to ATOXF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ATOXFNAK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 28 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ATOXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NAK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FRAAX57.430.54
+0.95%
Franklin Growth Opportunities Adv
HFERX45.200.21
+0.47%
Janus Henderson European Focus N
GBVCX11.660.03
+0.26%
Pioneer Global Sustainable Value C
HIBSX100.750.23
+0.23%
Hartford Stock HLS IB
SBIDX9.65-0.05
-0.52%
Sterling Capital Behavioral Intl Eq C

ATOXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ATOXF and JZRIF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ATOXF and JZRIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ATOXF
1D Price
Change %
ATOXF100%
-5.54%
JZRIF - ATOXF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NAK - ATOXF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.02%
SRCGF - ATOXF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TNTMF - ATOXF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CGMLF - ATOXF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

NAK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NAK has been loosely correlated with UEC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NAK jumps, then UEC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NAK
1D Price
Change %
NAK100%
-1.02%
UEC - NAK
33%
Loosely correlated
+3.36%
GSM - NAK
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.25%
CGMLF - NAK
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TMQ - NAK
29%
Poorly correlated
+9.09%
URG - NAK
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More