It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ATPC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileDAR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ATPC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DAR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
ATPC (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а +2.67% price change this week, while DAR (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was +7.89% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was +0.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.55%, and the average quarterly price growth was +772.00%.
DAR is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.
Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.
ATPC | DAR | ATPC / DAR | |
Capitalization | 69.3M | 5.43B | 1% |
EBITDA | -2.53M | 801M | -0% |
Gain YTD | 13.983 | 1.900 | 736% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | 52.82 | - |
Revenue | 1.45M | 5.7B | 0% |
Total Cash | 216K | 94.6M | 0% |
Total Debt | 293K | 4.22B | 0% |
ATPC | DAR | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 7 | 7 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 100 Overvalued | 89 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 89 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | 58 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
DAR's Valuation (89) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry is in the same range as ATPC (100) in the null industry. This means that DAR’s stock grew similarly to ATPC’s over the last 12 months.
DAR's Profit vs Risk Rating (89) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry is in the same range as ATPC (100) in the null industry. This means that DAR’s stock grew similarly to ATPC’s over the last 12 months.
DAR's SMR Rating (100) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry is in the same range as ATPC (100) in the null industry. This means that DAR’s stock grew similarly to ATPC’s over the last 12 months.
DAR's Price Growth Rating (58) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry is in the same range as ATPC (60) in the null industry. This means that DAR’s stock grew similarly to ATPC’s over the last 12 months.
DAR's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry is in the same range as ATPC (100) in the null industry. This means that DAR’s stock grew similarly to ATPC’s over the last 12 months.
ATPC | DAR | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago82% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago90% | 1 day ago75% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago86% | 1 day ago79% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago71% | 1 day ago81% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago25% | 1 day ago78% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago23% | 1 day ago72% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago85% | 5 days ago73% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago90% | 10 days ago74% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago86% | 1 day ago80% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago89% | 1 day ago64% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that ATPC and UVRBF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ATPC and UVRBF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ATPC | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ATPC | 100% | -2.89% | ||
UVRBF - ATPC | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
WWNTY - ATPC | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
LW - ATPC | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.72% | ||
WLMIF - ATPC | 18% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
DAR - ATPC | 17% Poorly correlated | -0.32% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that DAR and SAPIF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DAR and SAPIF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DAR | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
DAR | 100% | -0.32% | ||
SAPIF - DAR | 32% Poorly correlated | +1.34% | ||
FAMI - DAR | 27% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
K - DAR | 27% Poorly correlated | -0.36% | ||
USNA - DAR | 25% Poorly correlated | -2.27% | ||
CENT - DAR | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.61% | ||
More |