ATPC
Price
$1.18
Change
-$0.11 (-8.53%)
Updated
Apr 3, 02:30 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
25.44M
LW
Price
$59.84
Change
+$5.69 (+10.51%)
Updated
Apr 3, 02:48 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
15.38B
Earnings call today
Ad is loading...

ATPC vs LW

Header iconATPC vs LW Comparison
Open Charts ATPC vs LWBanner chart's image
Agape ATP
Price$1.18
Change-$0.11 (-8.53%)
Volume$1.2K
Capitalization25.44M
Lamb Weston Holdings
Price$59.84
Change+$5.69 (+10.51%)
Volume$1.39K
Capitalization15.38B
ATPC vs LW Comparison Chart
Loading...
ATPC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ATPC vs. LW commentary
Apr 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ATPC is a StrongBuy and LW is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 03, 2025
Stock price -- (ATPC: $1.29 vs. LW: $54.15)
Brand notoriety: ATPC and LW are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ATPC: 3% vs. LW: 132%
Market capitalization -- ATPC: $25.44M vs. LW: $15.38B
ATPC [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $25.44M. LW’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $15.38B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ATPC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLW’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ATPC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LW is a better buy in the long-term than ATPC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ATPC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LW’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ATPC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LW’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LW is a better buy in the short-term than ATPC.

Price Growth

ATPC (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а +25.24% price change this week, while LW (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was +0.82% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -0.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.55%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.70%.

Reported Earning Dates

LW is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (-0.73% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LW($15.4B) has a higher market cap than ATPC($25.4M). ATPC YTD gains are higher at: 9.322 vs. LW (-18.484). LW has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.34B vs. ATPC (-1.66M). ATPC has less debt than LW: ATPC (375K) vs LW (3.63B). LW has higher revenues than ATPC: LW (6.35B) vs ATPC (1.43M).
ATPCLWATPC / LW
Capitalization25.4M15.4B0%
EBITDA-1.66M1.34B-0%
Gain YTD9.322-18.484-50%
P/E RatioN/A13.62-
Revenue1.43M6.35B0%
Total Cash312KN/A-
Total Debt375K3.63B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ATPC vs LW: Fundamental Ratings
ATPC
LW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2220
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
37
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9942
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5663
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2213
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LW's Valuation (37) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ATPC (100) in the null industry. This means that LW’s stock grew somewhat faster than ATPC’s over the last 12 months.

LW's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as ATPC (100) in the null industry. This means that LW’s stock grew similarly to ATPC’s over the last 12 months.

LW's SMR Rating (42) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ATPC (99) in the null industry. This means that LW’s stock grew somewhat faster than ATPC’s over the last 12 months.

ATPC's Price Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as LW (63) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that ATPC’s stock grew similarly to LW’s over the last 12 months.

LW's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as ATPC (22) in the null industry. This means that LW’s stock grew similarly to ATPC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ATPCLW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
19%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
16%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ATPC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LAD306.129.29
+3.13%
Lithia Motors
SCL54.550.36
+0.66%
Stepan Co
GOODN22.900.03
+0.15%
Gladstone Commercial Corp
DGICA19.53-0.19
-0.96%
Donegal Group
VXRT0.35-0.02
-6.04%
Vaxart

ATPC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ATPC and UVRBF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ATPC and UVRBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ATPC
1D Price
Change %
ATPC100%
+1.57%
UVRBF - ATPC
21%
Poorly correlated
+10.00%
WWNTY - ATPC
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LW - ATPC
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.58%
WLMIF - ATPC
18%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HRL - ATPC
14%
Poorly correlated
-0.39%
More

LW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LW and RSGUF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LW and RSGUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LW
1D Price
Change %
LW100%
+1.58%
RSGUF - LW
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
POST - LW
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.18%
ATPC - LW
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.57%
K - LW
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.06%
USNA - LW
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.40%
More