ATPC
Price
$1.39
Change
+$0.03 (+2.22%)
Updated
Aug 27, 04:55 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
67.51M
LW
Price
$56.69
Change
+$0.28 (+0.50%)
Updated
Aug 27, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
7.9B
34 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ATPC vs LW

Header iconATPC vs LW Comparison
Open Charts ATPC vs LWBanner chart's image
Agape ATP
Price$1.39
Change+$0.03 (+2.22%)
Volume$3.1K
Capitalization67.51M
Lamb Weston Holdings
Price$56.69
Change+$0.28 (+0.50%)
Volume$7.35K
Capitalization7.9B
ATPC vs LW Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ATPC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ATPC vs. LW commentary
Aug 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ATPC is a StrongBuy and LW is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 28, 2025
Stock price -- (ATPC: $1.38 vs. LW: $56.66)
Brand notoriety: ATPC and LW are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ATPC: 192% vs. LW: 47%
Market capitalization -- ATPC: $67.51M vs. LW: $7.9B
ATPC [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $67.51M. LW’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $7.9B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $238.76B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $7.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ATPC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLW’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ATPC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LW is a better buy in the long-term than ATPC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ATPC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LW’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ATPC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LW’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LW is a better buy in the short-term than ATPC.

Price Growth

ATPC (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а +6.54% price change this week, while LW (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was +2.66% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was +1.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +800.11%.

Reported Earning Dates

LW is expected to report earnings on Oct 01, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (+1.32% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LW($7.9B) has a higher market cap than ATPC($67.5M). ATPC YTD gains are higher at: 14.407 vs. LW (-13.535). LW has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.07B vs. ATPC (-2.53M). LW has more cash in the bank: 70.7M vs. ATPC (216K). ATPC has less debt than LW: ATPC (293K) vs LW (4.16B). LW has higher revenues than ATPC: LW (6.45B) vs ATPC (1.45M).
ATPCLWATPC / LW
Capitalization67.5M7.9B1%
EBITDA-2.53M1.07B-0%
Gain YTD14.407-13.535-106%
P/E RatioN/A22.66-
Revenue1.45M6.45B0%
Total Cash216K70.7M0%
Total Debt293K4.16B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ATPC vs LW: Fundamental Ratings
ATPC
LW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
76
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
36
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10096
SMR RATING
1..100
9544
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6359
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2411
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LW's Valuation (36) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ATPC (100) in the null industry. This means that LW’s stock grew somewhat faster than ATPC’s over the last 12 months.

LW's Profit vs Risk Rating (96) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as ATPC (100) in the null industry. This means that LW’s stock grew similarly to ATPC’s over the last 12 months.

LW's SMR Rating (44) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ATPC (95) in the null industry. This means that LW’s stock grew somewhat faster than ATPC’s over the last 12 months.

LW's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as ATPC (63) in the null industry. This means that LW’s stock grew similarly to ATPC’s over the last 12 months.

LW's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as ATPC (24) in the null industry. This means that LW’s stock grew similarly to ATPC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ATPCLW
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ATPC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ABWCX16.15N/A
N/A
AB All Market Total Return C
NAESX120.45N/A
N/A
Vanguard Small Cap Index Inv
CMTFX105.16N/A
N/A
Columbia Global Technology Growth Inst
RMLPX24.79N/A
N/A
Recurrent MLP & Infrastructure Class I
WAYFX19.25N/A
N/A
Waycross Focused Core Equity Fund

ATPC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ATPC and UVRBF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ATPC and UVRBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ATPC
1D Price
Change %
ATPC100%
+1.89%
UVRBF - ATPC
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WWNTY - ATPC
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LW - ATPC
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.77%
WLMIF - ATPC
18%
Poorly correlated
+3.90%
DAR - ATPC
17%
Poorly correlated
-4.26%
More