ATUSF
Price
$21.05
Change
-$0.40 (-1.86%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
768.35M
EEMMF
Price
$1.04
Change
-$0.01 (-0.95%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
81.67M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ATUSF vs EEMMF

Header iconATUSF vs EEMMF Comparison
Open Charts ATUSF vs EEMMFBanner chart's image
Altius Minerals
Price$21.05
Change-$0.40 (-1.86%)
Volume$12.46K
Capitalization768.35M
E3 LITHIUM
Price$1.04
Change-$0.01 (-0.95%)
Volume$13.06K
Capitalization81.67M
ATUSF vs EEMMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ATUSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EEMMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ATUSF vs. EEMMF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ATUSF is a StrongBuy and EEMMF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (ATUSF: $21.05 vs. EEMMF: $1.04)
Brand notoriety: ATUSF and EEMMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ATUSF: 61% vs. EEMMF: 48%
Market capitalization -- ATUSF: $768.35M vs. EEMMF: $81.67M
ATUSF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $768.35M. EEMMF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $81.67M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ATUSF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileEEMMF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ATUSF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • EEMMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ATUSF is a better buy in the long-term than EEMMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ATUSF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EEMMF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ATUSF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • EEMMF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EEMMF is a better buy in the short-term than ATUSF.

Price Growth

ATUSF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +5.47% price change this week, while EEMMF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -0.86% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.83%.

Reported Earning Dates

ATUSF is expected to report earnings on May 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.20% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ATUSF($768M) has a higher market cap than EEMMF($81.7M). EEMMF YTD gains are higher at: 61.415 vs. ATUSF (13.183). ATUSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 75.7M vs. EEMMF (-8.03M). ATUSF has more cash in the bank: 76.8M vs. EEMMF (18.1M). EEMMF has less debt than ATUSF: EEMMF (692K) vs ATUSF (119M). ATUSF has higher revenues than EEMMF: ATUSF (78.5M) vs EEMMF (0).
ATUSFEEMMFATUSF / EEMMF
Capitalization768M81.7M940%
EBITDA75.7M-8.03M-943%
Gain YTD13.18361.41521%
P/E Ratio34.01N/A-
Revenue78.5M0-
Total Cash76.8M18.1M424%
Total Debt119M692K17,197%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ATUSF vs EEMMF: Fundamental Ratings
ATUSF
EEMMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1320
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
16
Undervalued
41
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2579
SMR RATING
1..100
4694
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4635
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ATUSF's Valuation (16) in the null industry is in the same range as EEMMF (41). This means that ATUSF’s stock grew similarly to EEMMF’s over the last 12 months.

ATUSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EEMMF (79). This means that ATUSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than EEMMF’s over the last 12 months.

ATUSF's SMR Rating (46) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EEMMF (94). This means that ATUSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than EEMMF’s over the last 12 months.

EEMMF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as ATUSF (46). This means that EEMMF’s stock grew similarly to ATUSF’s over the last 12 months.

EEMMF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as ATUSF (100). This means that EEMMF’s stock grew similarly to ATUSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ATUSFEEMMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
66%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ATUSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EEMMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FDVA11.690.33
+2.90%
FREEDOM FINL HLDGS INC.
MQBKY140.770.54
+0.39%
Macquarie Group, Ltd.
ELKMF2.16N/A
N/A
Gold Road Resources Ltd.
MGPUF3.45N/A
N/A
M&G PLC
FTBYF0.38-0.03
-6.42%
Fortune Bay Corp.

ATUSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ATUSF has been loosely correlated with HBM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ATUSF jumps, then HBM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ATUSF
1D Price
Change %
ATUSF100%
-1.86%
HBM - ATUSF
54%
Loosely correlated
-2.47%
ERO - ATUSF
51%
Loosely correlated
-2.75%
CSCCF - ATUSF
47%
Loosely correlated
-3.34%
TECK - ATUSF
46%
Loosely correlated
-6.04%
LUNMF - ATUSF
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.83%
More

EEMMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EEMMF and ERO have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EEMMF and ERO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EEMMF
1D Price
Change %
EEMMF100%
-0.95%
ERO - EEMMF
29%
Poorly correlated
-2.75%
NILIF - EEMMF
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.40%
ATUSF - EEMMF
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.86%
BHP - EEMMF
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.72%
LAC - EEMMF
25%
Poorly correlated
-4.69%
More