AU
Price
$23.13
Change
-$0.99 (-4.10%)
Updated
Dec 18, 04:59 PM (EDT)
64 days until earnings call
BCEKF
Price
$0.26
Change
-$0.03 (-10.34%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
119 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

AU vs BCEKF

Header iconAU vs BCEKF Comparison
Open Charts AU vs BCEKFBanner chart's image
AngloGold Ashanti
Price$23.13
Change-$0.99 (-4.10%)
Volume$30.11K
CapitalizationN/A
Bear Creek Mining
Price$0.26
Change-$0.03 (-10.34%)
Volume$129.8K
CapitalizationN/A
AU vs BCEKF Comparison Chart
Loading...
AU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BCEKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AU vs. BCEKF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AU is a Buy and BCEKF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (AU: $23.15 vs. BCEKF: $0.26)
Brand notoriety: AU and BCEKF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AU: 78% vs. BCEKF: 71%
Market capitalization -- AU: $9.32B vs. BCEKF: $71.1M
AU [@Precious Metals] is valued at $9.32B. BCEKF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $71.1M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AU’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBCEKF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AU’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • BCEKF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, AU is a better buy in the long-term than BCEKF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AU’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BCEKF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AU’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • BCEKF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BCEKF is a better buy in the short-term than AU.

Price Growth

AU (@Precious Metals) experienced а -14.73% price change this week, while BCEKF (@Precious Metals) price change was -19.05% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -5.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.01%.

Reported Earning Dates

AU is expected to report earnings on Feb 21, 2025.

BCEKF is expected to report earnings on Apr 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-5.24% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AU($9.32B) has a higher market cap than BCEKF($71.1M). BCEKF YTD gains are higher at: 112.500 vs. AU (31.079). AU has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 959M vs. BCEKF (95K). AU has more cash in the bank: 312M vs. BCEKF (9.63M). BCEKF has less debt than AU: BCEKF (40M) vs AU (2.1B). AU has higher revenues than BCEKF: AU (4.53B) vs BCEKF (85.3M).
AUBCEKFAU / BCEKF
Capitalization9.32B71.1M13,104%
EBITDA959M95K1,009,474%
Gain YTD31.079112.50028%
P/E Ratio221.70N/A-
Revenue4.53B85.3M5,313%
Total Cash312M9.63M3,240%
Total Debt2.1B40M5,240%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AU vs BCEKF: Fundamental Ratings
AU
BCEKF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
962
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
61
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
76100
SMR RATING
1..100
5898
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5041
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10094
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AU's Valuation (14) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BCEKF (61) in the null industry. This means that AU’s stock grew somewhat faster than BCEKF’s over the last 12 months.

AU's Profit vs Risk Rating (76) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as BCEKF (100) in the null industry. This means that AU’s stock grew similarly to BCEKF’s over the last 12 months.

AU's SMR Rating (58) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BCEKF (98) in the null industry. This means that AU’s stock grew somewhat faster than BCEKF’s over the last 12 months.

BCEKF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as AU (50) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that BCEKF’s stock grew similarly to AU’s over the last 12 months.

BCEKF's P/E Growth Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as AU (100) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that BCEKF’s stock grew similarly to AU’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AUBCEKF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
AU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BCEKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ANVS5.110.11
+2.20%
Annovis Bio
SPGI500.51-2.35
-0.47%
S&P Global
FR52.01-0.44
-0.84%
First Industrial Realty Trust
GOGL8.85-0.13
-1.45%
Golden Ocean Group Limited
SPFI38.26-0.93
-2.37%
South Plains Financial

AU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AU has been closely correlated with AEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AU jumps, then AEM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AU
1D Price
Change %
AU100%
-1.75%
AEM - AU
75%
Closely correlated
-1.10%
AGI - AU
74%
Closely correlated
-0.16%
HMY - AU
73%
Closely correlated
-2.14%
DRD - AU
73%
Closely correlated
+0.33%
KGC - AU
71%
Closely correlated
-1.95%
More

BCEKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BCEKF has been loosely correlated with PAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BCEKF jumps, then PAAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCEKF
1D Price
Change %
BCEKF100%
+4.01%
PAAS - BCEKF
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.05%
AU - BCEKF
47%
Loosely correlated
-1.75%
ISVLF - BCEKF
46%
Loosely correlated
-3.12%
SLVRF - BCEKF
45%
Loosely correlated
-3.90%
FNV - BCEKF
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.15%
More