AU
Price
$43.85
Change
-$2.51 (-5.41%)
Updated
Jun 27, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
9.32B
35 days until earnings call
HCHDF
Price
$3.53
Change
+$0.11 (+3.22%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
510.46M
47 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AU vs HCHDF

Header iconAU vs HCHDF Comparison
Open Charts AU vs HCHDFBanner chart's image
AngloGold Ashanti
Price$43.85
Change-$2.51 (-5.41%)
Volume$98.79K
Capitalization9.32B
Hochschild Mining
Price$3.53
Change+$0.11 (+3.22%)
Volume$12.43K
Capitalization510.46M
AU vs HCHDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HCHDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AU vs. HCHDF commentary
Jun 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AU is a Hold and HCHDF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 27, 2025
Stock price -- (AU: $46.36 vs. HCHDF: $3.53)
Brand notoriety: AU and HCHDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AU: 97% vs. HCHDF: 59%
Market capitalization -- AU: $9.32B vs. HCHDF: $510.46M
AU [@Precious Metals] is valued at $9.32B. HCHDF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $510.46M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AU’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHCHDF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AU’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HCHDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, AU is a better buy in the long-term than HCHDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AU’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HCHDF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AU’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HCHDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AU is a better buy in the short-term than HCHDF.

Price Growth

AU (@Precious Metals) experienced а -3.66% price change this week, while HCHDF (@Precious Metals) price change was +6.33% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +1.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +56.64%.

Reported Earning Dates

AU is expected to report earnings on Aug 01, 2025.

HCHDF is expected to report earnings on Aug 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+1.00% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AU($9.32B) has a higher market cap than HCHDF($510M). AU has higher P/E ratio than HCHDF: AU (221.70) vs HCHDF (99.01). AU YTD gains are higher at: 105.813 vs. HCHDF (38.037). AU has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 959M vs. HCHDF (214M). AU has more cash in the bank: 312M vs. HCHDF (204M). HCHDF has less debt than AU: HCHDF (314M) vs AU (2.1B). AU has higher revenues than HCHDF: AU (4.53B) vs HCHDF (764M).
AUHCHDFAU / HCHDF
Capitalization9.32B510M1,827%
EBITDA959M214M448%
Gain YTD105.81338.037278%
P/E Ratio221.7099.01224%
Revenue4.53B764M593%
Total Cash312M204M153%
Total Debt2.1B314M668%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AU vs HCHDF: Fundamental Ratings
AU
HCHDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5914
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
11
Undervalued
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4564
SMR RATING
1..100
4561
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3748
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10093
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AU's Valuation (11) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as HCHDF (18) in the null industry. This means that AU’s stock grew similarly to HCHDF’s over the last 12 months.

AU's Profit vs Risk Rating (45) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as HCHDF (64) in the null industry. This means that AU’s stock grew similarly to HCHDF’s over the last 12 months.

AU's SMR Rating (45) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as HCHDF (61) in the null industry. This means that AU’s stock grew similarly to HCHDF’s over the last 12 months.

AU's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as HCHDF (48) in the null industry. This means that AU’s stock grew similarly to HCHDF’s over the last 12 months.

HCHDF's P/E Growth Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as AU (100) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that HCHDF’s stock grew similarly to AU’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AUHCHDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HCHDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MBNAX31.220.17
+0.55%
NYLI Balanced Class A
IUSCX11.35N/A
N/A
FI Instl Group U.S. Small Cap Eq
SAGCX35.03N/A
N/A
ClearBridge Growth C
MFWGX17.39N/A
N/A
MFS Global Total Return R1
PAXGX17.26N/A
N/A
Impax Global Opportunities Investor

AU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AU has been closely correlated with AEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AU jumps, then AEM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AU
1D Price
Change %
AU100%
-0.19%
AEM - AU
78%
Closely correlated
+2.73%
WPM - AU
77%
Closely correlated
+1.06%
GFI - AU
77%
Closely correlated
-0.79%
AGI - AU
77%
Closely correlated
+0.11%
KGC - AU
75%
Closely correlated
+3.53%
More

HCHDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HCHDF has been loosely correlated with HMY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HCHDF jumps, then HMY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HCHDF
1D Price
Change %
HCHDF100%
+3.32%
HMY - HCHDF
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.78%
AU - HCHDF
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.19%
DRD - HCHDF
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.23%
GFI - HCHDF
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.79%
FSM - HCHDF
38%
Loosely correlated
+2.31%
More