AU
Price
$29.52
Change
+$1.52 (+5.43%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
17 days until earnings call
WHGOF
Price
$0.19
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 4 closing price
Ad is loading...

AU vs WHGOF

Header iconAU vs WHGOF Comparison
Open Charts AU vs WHGOFBanner chart's image
AngloGold Ashanti
Price$29.52
Change+$1.52 (+5.43%)
Volume$3.74M
CapitalizationN/A
White Gold
Price$0.19
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2.34K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
AU vs WHGOF Comparison Chart
Loading...
AU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
AU vs. WHGOF commentary
Oct 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AU is a Sell and WHGOF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2024
Stock price -- (AU: $29.52 vs. WHGOF: $0.19)
Brand notoriety: AU and WHGOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AU: 173% vs. WHGOF: 51%
Market capitalization -- AU: $9.32B vs. WHGOF: $42.16M
AU [@Precious Metals] is valued at $9.32B. WHGOF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $42.16M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AU’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWHGOF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AU’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WHGOF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, AU is a better buy in the long-term than WHGOF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AU’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • AU’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

AU (@Precious Metals) experienced а +10.31% price change this week, while WHGOF (@Precious Metals) price change was +1.99% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +2.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.61%.

Reported Earning Dates

AU is expected to report earnings on Feb 21, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+2.12% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AU($9.32B) has a higher market cap than WHGOF($42.2M). AU YTD gains are higher at: 60.425 vs. WHGOF (-6.912). AU has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 959M vs. WHGOF (144K). AU has more cash in the bank: 312M vs. WHGOF (3.72M). AU has higher revenues than WHGOF: AU (4.53B) vs WHGOF (0).
AUWHGOFAU / WHGOF
Capitalization9.32B42.2M22,078%
EBITDA959M144K665,972%
Gain YTD60.425-6.912-874%
P/E Ratio221.70N/A-
Revenue4.53B0-
Total Cash312M3.72M8,396%
Total Debt2.1BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AU vs WHGOF: Fundamental Ratings
AU
WHGOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2054
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
15
Undervalued
25
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
63100
SMR RATING
1..100
8690
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4862
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
92100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AU's Valuation (15) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as WHGOF (25) in the null industry. This means that AU’s stock grew similarly to WHGOF’s over the last 12 months.

AU's Profit vs Risk Rating (63) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WHGOF (100) in the null industry. This means that AU’s stock grew somewhat faster than WHGOF’s over the last 12 months.

AU's SMR Rating (86) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as WHGOF (90) in the null industry. This means that AU’s stock grew similarly to WHGOF’s over the last 12 months.

AU's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as WHGOF (62) in the null industry. This means that AU’s stock grew similarly to WHGOF’s over the last 12 months.

AU's P/E Growth Rating (92) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as WHGOF (100) in the null industry. This means that AU’s stock grew similarly to WHGOF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AU
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
AU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL232.150.37
+0.16%
Apple
SPY582.350.05
+0.01%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA220.89-0.44
-0.20%
Tesla
BTC.X67399.836000-212.882810
-0.31%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME21.41-0.25
-1.15%
GameStop Corp

WHGOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WHGOF and ZIJMF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WHGOF and ZIJMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WHGOF
1D Price
Change %
WHGOF100%
+0.37%
ZIJMF - WHGOF
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.84%
MTA - WHGOF
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.84%
HL - WHGOF
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.33%
HMY - WHGOF
25%
Poorly correlated
+8.22%
AU - WHGOF
24%
Poorly correlated
+5.43%
More