AUBN
Price
$22.24
Change
-$1.03 (-4.43%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
46 days until earnings call
MFG
Price
$4.83
Change
-$0.10 (-2.03%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
42 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

AUBN vs MFG

Header iconAUBN vs MFG Comparison
Open Charts AUBN vs MFGBanner chart's image
Auburn National Ban
Price$22.24
Change-$1.03 (-4.43%)
Volume$1.74K
CapitalizationN/A
Mizuho Financial Group
Price$4.83
Change-$0.10 (-2.03%)
Volume$861K
CapitalizationN/A
AUBN vs MFG Comparison Chart
Loading...
AUBN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AUBN vs. MFG commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AUBN is a Hold and MFG is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (AUBN: $22.24 vs. MFG: $4.83)
Brand notoriety: AUBN and MFG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AUBN: 49% vs. MFG: 73%
Market capitalization -- AUBN: $66.38M vs. MFG: $49.2B
AUBN [@Regional Banks] is valued at $66.38M. MFG’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $49.2B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AUBN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMFG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AUBN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MFG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MFG is a better buy in the long-term than AUBN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AUBN’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MFG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AUBN’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MFG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MFG is a better buy in the short-term than AUBN.

Price Growth

AUBN (@Regional Banks) experienced а -4.75% price change this week, while MFG (@Regional Banks) price change was -5.29% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -2.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.55%.

Reported Earning Dates

AUBN is expected to report earnings on Feb 03, 2025.

MFG is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-2.30% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MFG($49.2B) has a higher market cap than AUBN($66.4M). AUBN has higher P/E ratio than MFG: AUBN (47.50) vs MFG (11.31). MFG YTD gains are higher at: 42.893 vs. AUBN (10.132). AUBN has less debt than MFG: AUBN (3.22M) vs MFG (20.53T). MFG has higher revenues than AUBN: MFG (2.88T) vs AUBN (23.3M).
AUBNMFGAUBN / MFG
Capitalization66.4M49.2B0%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD10.13242.89324%
P/E Ratio47.5011.31420%
Revenue23.3M2.88T0%
Total Cash16.4MN/A-
Total Debt3.22M20.53T0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AUBN vs MFG: Fundamental Ratings
AUBN
MFG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7367
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
68
Overvalued
41
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1009
SMR RATING
1..100
791
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4241
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1045
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MFG's Valuation (41) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as AUBN (68) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MFG’s stock grew similarly to AUBN’s over the last 12 months.

MFG's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Major Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for AUBN (100) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MFG’s stock grew significantly faster than AUBN’s over the last 12 months.

MFG's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for AUBN (79) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MFG’s stock grew significantly faster than AUBN’s over the last 12 months.

MFG's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as AUBN (42) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MFG’s stock grew similarly to AUBN’s over the last 12 months.

AUBN's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MFG (45) in the Major Banks industry. This means that AUBN’s stock grew somewhat faster than MFG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AUBNMFG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
57%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
AUBN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
POWI62.42-2.64
-4.06%
Power Integrations
AVNS16.18-0.84
-4.94%
Avanos Medical
NRXP1.54-0.09
-5.79%
NRX Pharmaceuticals
IOT43.64-3.14
-6.71%
Samsara
MRSN1.69-0.34
-16.75%
Mersana Therapeutics

AUBN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AUBN and SSBI have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AUBN and SSBI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AUBN
1D Price
Change %
AUBN100%
-4.43%
SSBI - AUBN
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.52%
CFBK - AUBN
25%
Poorly correlated
-10.72%
FSEA - AUBN
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.57%
IITSF - AUBN
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.73%
MFG - AUBN
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.03%
More

MFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MFG has been closely correlated with SUTNY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MFG jumps, then SUTNY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MFG
1D Price
Change %
MFG100%
-2.03%
SUTNY - MFG
71%
Closely correlated
-2.06%
SBNY - MFG
38%
Loosely correlated
+3.85%
DBSDY - MFG
37%
Loosely correlated
-3.26%
UOVEY - MFG
35%
Loosely correlated
-2.75%
ISNPY - MFG
35%
Loosely correlated
-1.37%
More