MFG
Price
$10.49
Change
+$0.01 (+0.10%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
126.76B
16 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NWG
Price
$17.50
Change
-$0.26 (-1.46%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
69.58B
17 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MFG vs NWG

MFG vs NWG Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MFG vs. NWG commentary
Jul 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFG is a StrongBuy and NWG is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 14, 2026
Stock price -- (MFG: $10.49 vs. NWG: $17.50)
Brand notoriety: MFG and NWG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MFG: 74% vs. NWG: 74%
Market capitalization -- MFG: $126.76B vs. NWG: $69.58B
MFG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $126.76B. NWG’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $69.58B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.48B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MFG’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileNWG’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • MFG’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • NWG’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, NWG is a better buy in the long-term than MFG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MFG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NWG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MFG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NWG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MFG is a better buy in the short-term than NWG.

Price Growth

MFG (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.35% price change this week, while NWG (@Regional Banks) price change was -4.74% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.22%.

Reported Earning Dates

MFG is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.

NWG is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.58% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MFG($127B) has a higher market cap than NWG($69.6B). MFG has higher P/E ratio than NWG: MFG (16.87) vs NWG (9.50). MFG YTD gains are higher at: 43.306 vs. NWG (4.295). NWG has less debt than MFG: NWG (6.64B) vs MFG (26.18T). MFG has higher revenues than NWG: MFG (4.32T) vs NWG (17B).
MFGNWGMFG / NWG
Capitalization127B69.6B182%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD43.3064.2951,008%
P/E Ratio16.879.50178%
Revenue4.32T17B25,394%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt26.18T6.64B394,173%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MFG vs NWG: Fundamental Ratings
MFG
NWG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4426
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
80
Overvalued
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
910
SMR RATING
1..100
17
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3943
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2040
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NWG's Valuation (17) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MFG (80). This means that NWG’s stock grew somewhat faster than MFG’s over the last 12 months.

MFG's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as NWG (10). This means that MFG’s stock grew similarly to NWG’s over the last 12 months.

MFG's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as NWG (7). This means that MFG’s stock grew similarly to NWG’s over the last 12 months.

MFG's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as NWG (43). This means that MFG’s stock grew similarly to NWG’s over the last 12 months.

MFG's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as NWG (40). This means that MFG’s stock grew similarly to NWG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MFGNWG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
41%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MFG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NWG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AI9.160.21
+2.35%
C3ai
PC9.40N/A
N/A
Premium Catering Holdings Limited
AMGN360.45-2.94
-0.81%
Amgen
MHK107.66-2.31
-2.10%
Mohawk Industries
ORGO2.27-0.13
-5.42%
Organogenesis Holdings

MFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MFG has been loosely correlated with DB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MFG jumps, then DB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MFG
1D Price
Change %
MFG100%
+0.10%
DB - MFG
49%
Loosely correlated
-1.48%
LYG - MFG
48%
Loosely correlated
-1.83%
NWG - MFG
43%
Loosely correlated
-1.46%
KB - MFG
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.05%
WF - MFG
40%
Loosely correlated
-1.28%
More

NWG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NWG has been closely correlated with LYG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NWG jumps, then LYG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NWG
1D Price
Change %
NWG100%
-1.46%
LYG - NWG
85%
Closely correlated
-1.83%
BCS - NWG
68%
Closely correlated
-0.69%
DB - NWG
63%
Loosely correlated
-1.48%
UBS - NWG
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.29%
BBVA - NWG
57%
Loosely correlated
-1.17%
More